International Association
for Cryptologic Research

The Cryptography research team at Microsoft Research, Redmond, is looking for PhD student interns for the spring or summer of 2025. Please apply as soon as possible if you are interested in joining us!

For more information and to apply, go to https://jobs.careers.microsoft.com/global/en/job/1791134.

Closing date for applications:

Contact: Karen Easterbrook (keaster@microsoft.com) or Kim Laine (kim.laine@microsoft.com)

Lattice-based succinct arguments allow to prove bounded-norm satisfiability of relations, such as $f(\vec{s}) = \vec{t} \bmod q$ and $\|\vec{s}\|\leq \beta$, over specific cyclotomic rings $\mathcal{O}_\mathcal{K}$, with proof size polylogarithmic in the witness size. However, state-of-the-art protocols require either 1) a super-polynomial size modulus $q$ due to a soundness gap in the security argument, or 2) a verifier which runs in time linear in the witness size. Furthermore, construction techniques often rely on specific choices of $\mathcal{K}$ which are not mutually compatible. In this work, we exhibit a diverse toolkit for constructing efficient lattice-based succinct arguments:

(i) We identify new subtractive sets for general cyclotomic fields $\mathcal{K}$ and their maximal real subfields $\mathcal{K}^+$, which are useful as challenge sets, e.g. in arguments for exact norm bounds. (ii) We construct modular, verifier-succinct reductions of knowledge for the bounded-norm satisfiability of structured-linear/inner-product relations, without any soundness gap, under the vanishing SIS assumption, over any $\mathcal{K}$ which admits polynomial-size subtractive sets. (iii) We propose a framework to use twisted trace maps, i.e. maps of the form $\tau(z) = \frac{1}{N} \cdot \mathsf{Trace}_{\mathcal{K}/\mathbb{Q}}( \alpha \cdot z )$, to embed $\mathbb{Z}$-inner-products as $\mathcal{R}$-inner-products for some structured subrings $\mathcal{R} \subseteq \mathcal{O}_\mathcal{K}$ whenever the conductor has a square-free odd part. (iv) We present a simple extension of our reductions of knowledge for proving the consistency between the coefficient embedding and the Chinese Remainder Transform (CRT) encoding of $\vec{s}$ over any cyclotomic field $\mathcal{K}$ with a smooth conductor, based on a succinct decomposition of the CRT map into automorphisms, and a new, simple succinct argument for proving automorphism relations.

Combining all techniques, we obtain, for example, verifier-succinct arguments for proving that $\vec{s}$ satisfying $f(\vec{s}) = \vec{t} \bmod q$ has binary coefficients, without soundness gap and with polynomial-size modulus $q$.

We further explore the explicit connections between supersingular curve isogenies and Bruhat-Tits trees. By identifying a supersingular elliptic curve $E$ over $\mathbb{F}_p$ as the root of the tree, and a basis for the Tate module $T_\ell(E)$; our main result is that given a vertex $M$ of the Bruhat-Tits tree one can write down a generator of the ideal $I \subseteq \text{End}(E)$ directly, using simple linear algebra, that defines an isogeny corresponding to the path in the Bruhat-Tits tree from the root to the vertex $M$. In contrast to previous methods to go from a vertex in the Bruhat-Tits tree to an ideal, once a basis for the Tate module is set up and an explicit map $\Phi : \text{End}(E) \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}_\ell} \to M_2( \mathbb{Z}_\ell )$ is constructed, our method does not require any computations involving elliptic curves, isogenies, or discrete logs. This idea leads to simplifications and potential speedups to algorithms for converting between isogenies and ideals.

Succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARKs) enable a prover to produce a short and efficiently verifiable proof of the validity of an arbitrary NP statement. Recent constructions of efficient SNARKs have led to interest in using them for a wide range of applications, but unfortunately, deployment of SNARKs in these applications faces a key bottleneck: SNARK provers require a prohibitive amount of time and memory to generate proofs for even moderately large statements. While there has been progress in reducing prover time, prover memory remains an issue. In this work, we describe Scribe, a new low-memory SNARK that can efficiently prove large statements even on cheap consumer devices such as smartphones by leveraging a plentiful, but heretofore unutilized, resource: disk storage. In more detail, instead of storing its (large) intermediate state in RAM, Scribe's prover instead stores it on disk. To ensure that accesses to state are efficient, we design Scribe's prover in a *read-write streaming* model of computation that allows the prover to read and modify its state only in a streaming manner.

We implement and evaluate Scribe's prover, and show that, on commodity hardware, it can easily scale to circuits of size $2^{28}$ gates while using only 2GB of memory and incurring only minimal proving latency overhead (10-35%) compared to a state-of-the-art memory-intensive baseline (HyperPlonk [EUROCRYPT 2023]) that requires much more memory. Our implementation minimizes overhead by leveraging the streaming access pattern to enable several systems optimizations that together mask I/O costs.

The Ascon authenticated encryption scheme and hash function of Dobraunig et al (Journal of Cryptology 2021) were recently selected as winner of the NIST lightweight cryptography competition. The mode underlying Ascon authenticated encryption (Ascon-AE) resembles ideas of SpongeWrap, but not quite, and various works have investigated the generic security of Ascon-AE, all covering different attack scenarios and with different bounds. This work systemizes knowledge on the mode security of Ascon-AE, and fills gaps where needed. We consider six mainstream security models, all in the multi-user setting: (i) nonce-respecting security, reflecting on the existing bounds of Chakraborty et al (ASIACRYPT 2023, ACISP 2024) and Lefevre and Mennink (SAC 2024), (ii) nonce-misuse resistance, observing a non-fixable flaw in the proof of Chakraborty et al (ACISP 2024), (iii) nonce-misuse resilience, delivering missing security analysis, (iv) leakage resilience, delivering a new security analysis that supersedes the informal proof sketch (though in a different model) of Guo et al (ToSC 2020), (v) state-recovery security, expanding on the analysis of Lefevre and Mennink, and (vi) release of unverified plaintext, also delivering missing security analysis. We also match all bounds with tight attacks. As a bonus, we systemize the knowledge on Ascon-Hash and Ascon-PRF (but there are no technical novelties here).

This paper investigates pseudorandom generation in the context of masked cryptographic implementation. Although masking and pseudorandom generators (PRGs) have been distinctly studied for a long time, little literature studies how the randomness in the masked implementation should be generated. The lack of analysis on mask-bits generators makes the practical security of masked cryptographic implementation unclear, and practitioners (e.g., designer, implementer, and evaluator) may be confused about how to realize it. This paper provides a novel viewpoint and comprehensive analyses by developing new three models, which correspond to respective practical scenarios of leakage assessment, quantitative evaluation of side-channel security (e.g., success rate), and practical deployment. We reveal what properties are required for each scenario. In particular, we support a long-held belief/folklore with a proof: for the output of PRG for masking, cryptographic security (i.e., randomness and unpredictability) is sufficient but not necessary, but only a statistical uniformity is necessary. In addition, we thoroughly investigate the SCA security of PRGs in the wild in the masking context. We conclude this paper with some recommendations for practitioners, with a proposal of leakage-resilient method of comparative performance.

This paper introduces the Pad Thai message recovery attack on REDOG, a rank-metric code-based encryption scheme selected for the second round of evaluation in the Korean Post-Quantum Cryptography (KPQC) competition. The attack exploits the low rank weight of a portion of the ciphertext to construct multiple systems of linear equations, one of which is noise-free and can be solved to recover the secret message. The Pad Thai attack significantly undermines the security of REDOG, revealing that its provided security is much lower than originally claimed.

The CL cryptosystem, introduced by Castagnos and Laguillaumie in 2015, is a linearly homomorphic encryption scheme that has seen numerous developments and applications in recent years, particularly in the field of secure multiparty computation. Designing efficient zero-knowledge proofs for the CL framework is critical, especially for achieving adaptive security for such multiparty protocols. This is a challenging task due to the particularities of class groups of quadratic fields used to instantiate the groups of unknown order required in the CL framework.

In this work, we provide efficient proofs and arguments for statements involving a large number of ciphertexts. We propose a new batched proof for correctness of CL ciphertexts and new succinct arguments for correctness of a shuffle of these ciphertexts. Previous efficient proofs of shuffle for linearly homomorphic encryption were designed for Elgamal “in the exponent” which has only a limited homomorphic property. In the line of a recent work by Braun, Damgard and Orlandi (CRYPTO 2023), all the new proofs and arguments provide partial extractability, a property that we formally introduce here. Thanks to this notion, we show that bulletproof techniques, which are in general implemented with groups of known prime order, can be applied in the CL framework despite the use of unknown order groups, giving non interactive arguments of logarithmic sizes.

To prove the practicability of our approach we have implemented these protocols with the BICYCL library, showing that computation and communication costs are competitive. We also illustrate that the partial extractability of our proofs provide enough guarantees for complex applications by presenting a bipartite private set intersection sum protocol which achieves security against malicious adversaries using CL encryption, removing limitations of a solution proposed by Miao et al. (CRYPTO 2020).

The fast-paced development and deployment of private messaging applications demands mechanisms to protect against the concomitant potential for abuse. While widely used end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) messaging systems have deployed mechanisms for users to verifiably report abusive messages without compromising the privacy of unreported messages, abuse reporting schemes for systems that additionally protect message metadata are still in their infancy. Existing solutions either focus on a relatively small portion of the design space or incur much higher communication and computation costs than their E2EE brethren.

This paper introduces new abuse reporting mechanisms that work for any private messaging system based on onion encryption. This includes low-latency systems that employ heuristic or opportunistic mixing of user traffic, as well as schemes based on mixnets. Along the way, we show that design decisions and abstractions that are well-suited to the E2EE setting may actually impede security and performance improvements in the metadata-hiding setting. We also explore stronger threat models for abuse reporting and moderation not explored in prior work, showing where prior work falls short and how to strengthen both our scheme and others' -- including deployed E2EE messaging platforms -- to achieve higher levels of security.

We implement a prototype of our scheme and find that it outperforms the best known solutions in this setting by well over an order of magnitude for each step of the message delivery and reporting process, with overheads almost matching those of message franking techniques used by E2EE encrypted messaging apps today.

Folding schemes (Kothapalli et al., CRYPTO 2022) are a conceptually simple, yet powerful cryptographic primitive that can be used as a building block to realise incrementally verifiable computation (IVC) with low recursive overhead without general-purpose non-interactive succinct arguments of knowledge (SNARK). Most folding schemes known rely on the hardness of the discrete logarithm problem, and thus are both not quantum-resistant and operate over large prime fields. Existing post-quantum folding schemes (Boneh, Chen, ePrint 2024/257) based on lattice assumptions instead are secure under structured lattice assumptions, such as the Module Short Integer Solution Assumption (MSIS), which also binds them to relatively complex arithmetic. In contrast, we construct Lova, the first folding scheme whose security relies on the (unstructured) SIS assumption. We provide a Rust implementation of Lova, which makes only use of arithmetic in hardware-friendly power-of-two moduli. Crucially, this avoids the need of implementing and performing any finite field arithmetic. At the core of our results lies a new exact Euclidean norm proof which might be of independent interest.

This paper introduces a cryptographic method that enables users to prove that an event occurred in the past and that a specified amount of time has since elapsed, without disclosing the exact timestamp of the event. The method leverages zero-knowledge proofs and an on-chain Incremental Merkle Tree to store hash commitments. By utilizing the Poseidon hash function and implementing zero-knowledge circuits in Noir, this approach ensures both the integrity and confidentiality of temporal information.

Automated cryptanalysis has seen a lot of attraction and success in the past decade, leading to new distinguishers or key-recovery attacks against various ciphers. We argue that the improved efficiency and usability of these new tools have been undervalued, especially for design processes. In this article, we break for the first time the classical iterative design paradigm for symmetric-key primitives, where constructions are built around the repetition of a round function. We propose instead a new design framework, so-called uKNIT, that allows a round-by-round optimization-led automated construction of the primitives and where each round can be entirely different from the others (the security/performance trade-off actually benefiting from this non-alignment).

This new design framework being non-trivial to instantiate, we further propose a method for SPN ciphers using a genetic algorithm and leveraging advances in automated cryptanalysis: given a pool of good cipher candidates on $x$ rounds, our algorithm automatically generates and selects $(x+1)$-round candidates by evaluating their security and performance. We emphasize that our design pipeline is also the first to propose a fully automated design process, with completely integrated implementation and security analysis.

We finally exemplify our new design strategy on the important use-case of low-latency cryptography, by proposing the uKNIT-BC block cipher, together with a complete security analysis and benchmarks. Compared to the state-of-the-art in low-latency ciphers (PRINCEv2), uKNIT-BC improves on all crucial security and performance directions at the same time, reducing latency by 10%, while increasing resistance against classical differential/linear cryptanalysis by more than 10%. It also reduces area by 17% and energy consumption by 44% when fixing the latency of both ciphers. As a contribution of independent interest, we discovered a generalization of the Superposition-Tweakey (STK) construction for key schedules, unlocking its application to bit-oriented ciphers.

We consider the problem of electing a leader among $n$ parties with the guarantee that each (honest) party has a reasonable probability of being elected, even in the presence of a coalition that controls a subset of parties, trying to bias the output. This notion is called ``game-theoretic fairness'' because such protocols ensure that following the honest behavior is an equilibrium and also the best response for every party and coalition. In the two-party case, Blum's commit-and-reveal protocol (where if one party aborts, then the other is declared the leader) satisfies this notion and it is also known that one-way functions are necessary. Recent works study this problem in the multi-party setting. They show that composing Blum's 2-party protocol for $\log n$ rounds in a tournament-tree-style manner results with {perfect game-theoretic fairness}: each honest party has probability $\ge 1/n$ of being elected as leader, no matter how large the coalition is. Logarithmic round complexity is also shown to be necessary if we require perfect fairness against a coalition of size $n-1$. Relaxing the above two requirements, i.e., settling for approximate game-theoretic fairness and guaranteeing fairness against only constant fraction size coalitions, it is known that there are $O(\log ^* n)$ round protocols.

This leaves many open problems, in particular, whether one can go below logarithmic round complexity by relaxing only one of the strong requirements from above. We manage to resolve this problem for commit-and-reveal style protocols, showing that - $\Omega(\log n/\log\log n)$ rounds are necessary if we settle for approximate fairness against very large (more than constant fraction) coalitions; - $\Omega(\log n)$ rounds are necessary if we settle for perfect fairness against $n^\epsilon$ size coalitions (for any constant $\epsilon>0$). These show that both relaxations made in prior works are necessary to go below logarithmic round complexity. Lastly, we provide several additional upper and lower bounds for the case of single-round commit-and-reveal style protocols.

We present the first comprehensive study on thresholdizing practical OV-based signature schemes, specifically focusing on MAYO and UOV. Our approach begins by addressing the challenges associated with thresholdizing algorithms that sample solutions to linear equation systems of the form $Ax = y$, which are fundamental to OV-based signature schemes. Previous attempts have introduced levels of leakage that we deem insecure. We propose a novel minimum-leakage solution and assess its practicality. Furthermore, we explore the thresholdization of the entire functionality of these signature schemes, demonstrating their unique applications in networks and cryptographic protocols.

Ensuring transaction privacy in blockchain systems is essential to safeguard user data and financial activity from exposure on public ledgers. This paper conducts a systematization of knowledge (SoK) on privacy-preserving techniques in cryptocurrencies with native privacy features. We define and compare privacy notions such as confidentiality, k-anonymity, full anonymity, and sender-receiver unlinkability, and categorize the cryptographic techniques employed to achieve these guarantees. Our analysis highlights the trade-offs between privacy guarantees, scalability, and regulatory compliance. Finally, we evaluate the usability of the most popular private cryptocurrencies providing insights into their practical deployment and user interaction.

Through this analysis, we identify key gaps and challenges in current privacy solutions, highlighting areas where further research and development are needed to enhance privacy while maintaining scalability and security.

In this paper, we put forward a new practical application of Inner-Product Functional Encryption (IPFE) that we call Message Selection functional encryption (M-Sel) which allows users to decrypt selected portions of a ciphertext. In a message selection functional encryption scheme, the plaintext is partitioned into a set of messages M = {m1, . . . , mt}. The encryption of M consists in encrypting each of its elements using distinct encryption keys. A user with a functional decryption key skx derived from a selection vector x can access a subset of M from the encryption thereof and nothing more. Our construction is generic and combines a symmetric encryption scheme and an inner product functional encryption scheme, therefore, its security is tied to theirs. By instantiating our generic construction from a DDH-based IPFE we obtain a message selection FE with constant-size decryption keys suitable for key storage in lightweight devices in the context of Internet of Things (IoT).

The interest in realizing generic PQC KEM-based PAKEs has increased significantly in the last few years. One such PAKE is the CAKE protocol, proposed by Beguinet et al. (ACNS ’23). However, despite its simple design based on the well-studied PAKE protocol EKE by Bellovin and Merritt (IEEE S&P ’92), both CAKE and its variant OCAKE do not fully protect against quantum adversaries, as they rely on the Ideal Cipher (IC) model. Related and follow-up works, including Pan and Zeng (ASIACRYPT ’23), Dos Santos et al. (EUROCRYPT ’23), Alnahawi et al. (CANS ’24), and Arragia et al. (IACR ’24/308) although touching on that issue, still rely on an IC. Considering the lack of a quantum IC model and the difficulty of using the classical IC to achieve secure instantiations on public keys in general and PQC in particular, we set out to eliminate it from PAKE design. In this paper, we present the No IC Encryption (NICE)-PAKE, a (semi)-generic PAKE framework providing a quantum-safe alternative for the IC, utilizing simpler cryptographic components for the authentication step. To give a formal proof for our construction, we introduce the notions of A-Part-Secrecy (A-SEC-CCA), Splittable Collision Freeness (A-CFR-CCA) and Public Key Uniformity (SPLIT-PKU) for splittable LWE KEMs. We show the relation of the former to the Non-uniform LWE and the Weak Hint LWE assumptions, as well as its application to ring and module LWE. Notably, this side quest led to some surprising discoveries, as we concluded that the new notion is not directly interchangeable between the LWE variants, or at least not in a straightforward manner. Further, we show that our approach requires some tedious tweaking for the parameter choices in both FrodoKEM and CRYSTALS-Kyber to obtain a secure PAKE construction. We also address some fundamental issues with the common IC usage and identify differences between lattice KEMs regarding their suitability for generic PQC PAKEs, especially regarding the structure of their public keys. We believe that this work marks a further step towards achieving complete security against quantum adversaries in PQC PAKEs.

Recently, Francati et al. (Asiacrypt 2023) provided the first registered functional encryption (Reg-FE) beyond predicates. Reg-FE addresses the key escrow problem in functional encryption by allowing users to generate their own key pairs, effectively replacing the traditional private-key generator with a key curator. The key curator holds no secret information and runs deterministic algorithms to generate master public key for encryption and helper keys for decryption. However, existing Reg-FE schemes under standard assumptions require fixed data sizes, which limits their practicality in real-world applications. In this work, we introduce Multi-Function Registered Functional Encryption for Inner-Product (MultiReg-FE for IP), a novel extension of Reg-FE. It enables users to register multiple functions under a single public key. With MultiReg-FE, we achieve both Reg-FE for Unbounded Inner-Product (Unbounded IP), which removes the need to predetermine vector lengths, and Reg-FE for Attribute-Weighted Sums with Inner-Product (AWSw/IP), allowing computations over arbitrary numbers of attribute-value pairs. All our schemes achieve adaptive-IND-security. Specifically, we present: -MultiReg-FE for Inner-Product, which supports unbounded number of function vectors from each user. - Reg-FE for Unbounded Inner-Product, removing the need for preset vector lengths. - The first Reg-FE for AWSw/IP in public-key settings.

We propose plausible post-quantum (PQ) oblivious pseudorandom functions (OPRFs) based on the Power Residue PRF (Damgård CRYPTO’88), a generalization of the Legendre PRF. For security parameter $\lambda$, we consider the PRF $\mathsf{Gold}_k(x)$ that maps an integer $x$ modulo a public prime $p = 2^\lambda\cdot g + 1$ to the element $(k + x)^g \bmod p$, where $g$ is public and $\log g \approx 2\lambda$.

At the core of our constructions are efficient novel methods for evaluating $\mathsf{Gold}$ within two-party computation ($\mathsf{2PC}\text{-}\mathsf{Gold}$), achieving different security requirements. Here, the server $\mathcal{P}_s$ holds the PRF key $k$ whereas the client $\mathcal{P}_c$ holds the PRF input $x$, and they jointly evaluate $\mathsf{Gold}$ in 2PC. $\mathsf{2PC}\text{-}\mathsf{Gold}$ uses standard Vector Oblivious Linear Evaluation (VOLE) correlations and is information-theoretic and constant-round in the (V)OLE-hybrid model. We show:

• For a semi-honest $\mathcal{P}_s$ and a malicious $\mathcal{P}_c$: a $\mathsf{2PC}\text{-}\mathsf{Gold}$ that just uses a single (V)OLE correlation, and has a communication complexity of $3$ field elements ($2$ field elements if we only require a uniformly sampled key) and a computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\lambda)$ field operations. We refer to this as half-malicious security.

• For malicious $\mathcal{P}_s$ and $\mathcal{P}_c$: a $\mathsf{2PC}\text{-}\mathsf{Gold}$ that just uses $\frac{\lambda}{4} + \mathcal{O}(1)$ VOLE correlations, and has a communication complexity of $\frac{\lambda}{4} + \mathcal{O}(1)$ field elements and a computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\lambda)$ field operations.

These constructions support additional features and extensions, e.g., batched evaluations with better amortized costs where $\mathcal{P}_c$ repeatedly evaluates the PRF under the same key.

Furthermore, we extend $\mathsf{2PC}\text{-}\mathsf{Gold}$ to Verifiable OPRFs and use the methodology from Beullens et al. (ePrint’24) to obtain strong OPRF security in the universally composable setting.

All the protocols are efficient in practice. We implemented $\mathsf{2PC}\text{-}\mathsf{Gold}$—with (PQ) VOLEs—and benchmarked them. For example, our half-malicious (resp. malicious) $n$-batched PQ OPRFs incur about $100$B (resp. $1.9$KB) of amortized communication for $\lambda = 128$ and large enough $n$.

One-more problems like One-More Discrete Logarithm (OMDL) and One-More Diffie--Hellman (OMDH) have found wide use in cryptography, due to their ability to naturally model security definitions for interactive primitives like blind signatures and oblivious PRF. Furthermore, a generalization of OMDH called Threshold OMDH (TOMDH) has proven useful for building threshold versions of interactive protocols. However, due to their complexity it is often unclear how hard such problems actually are, leading cryptographers to analyze them in idealized models like the Generic Group Model (GGM) and Algebraic Group Model (AGM). In this work we give a complete characterization of known group-based one-more problems in the AGM, using the $Q$-DL hierarchy of assumptions defined in the work of Bauer, Fuchsbauer and Loss (CRYPTO '20).

1. Regarding (T)OMDH, we show (T)OMDH is part of the $Q$-DL hierarchy in the AGM; in particular, $Q$-OMDH is equivalent to $Q$-DL. Along the way we find and repair a flaw in the original GGM hardness proof of TOMDH, thereby giving the first correct proof that TOMDH is hard in the GGM.

2. Regarding OMDL, we show the $Q$-OMDL problems constitute an infinite hierarchy of problems in the AGM incomparable to the $Q$-DL hierarchy; that is, $Q$-OMDL is separate from $Q'$-OMDL if $Q' \neq Q$, and also separate from $Q'$-DL unless $Q = Q' = 0$.