IACR News
If you have a news item you wish to distribute, they should be sent to the communications secretary. See also the events database for conference announcements.
Here you can see all recent updates to the IACR webpage. These updates are also available:
04 February 2026
Mohammad Sadegh Ghoralivandzadeh
Rasheed Kibria, Farimah Farahmandi, Mark Tehranipoor
Feng Zhou, Hua Chen, Limin Fan, Junhuai Yang
02 February 2026
The report shows the tally of responses for each question, as well as some qualitative analyses of the received comments and some demographic breakdowns for additional context. While there is a wide diversity of views amongst respondents, there are some areas where a strong majority supports some form of change to our status quo. Over the coming months, the board will be fleshing out more concrete proposals for implementing such changes, and will be presenting them to the membership for feedback.
01 February 2026
SandboxAQ
- Collaborate with R&D and Product stakeholders to prototype new capabilities and explore future features.
- Apply strong systems engineering skills to design and build proof-of-concept solutions for complex security challenges.
- Design and implement systems for managing and analyzing large-scale, security-related data.
- Write high-quality, reusable code for R&D projects across a variety of languages, such as Rust, Go, or Python.
- Conduct technical investigations and present findings that will help shape the company's strategic direction.
- Own greenfield projects from the initial design phase through to a working prototype.
- 5+ years of industry experience building, deploying, and maintaining complex software projects and data pipelines.
- Demonstrated mastery across multiple languages, with required expertise in a systems language (e.g., Rust, C++, Zig) and fluency in higher-level languages (e.g., Python, Golang, Kotlin).
- Deep engineering knowledge of symmetric and asymmetric cryptography, cryptographic protocols, and their real-world application.
- Proven ability to apply academic foundations to real-world engineering challenges.
- Strong analytical thinking and communication skills, with an ability to thrive in a collaborative, fast-paced environment.
Closing date for applications:
Contact: James Howe
More information: https://www.sandboxaq.com/careers-list?ashby_jid=357a6ee1-3fe1-44f3-838a-f81df8b4e044
Simula UiB AS, Bergen, Norway
The successful candidates will work on two different projects named PREMAL and SECSHARE, respectively, in Håvard Raddum’s team. We are looking for candidates with a PhD degree in Cryptography, Computer Science, Mathematics, or a closely related field to work on the two projects. The focus of the two projects and the profile for their ideal candidates are described on the linked website where you apply (link below and in the headline).
The positions are both for a three-year period. Simula UiB currently has 11 early-career researchers working on a range of research problems in cryptography and information theory.
Simula UiB offers:
Deadline: 15 March 2026
Read more and apply at: https://www.simula.no/careers/job-openings/postdoctoral-fellows-in-fully-homomorphic-encryption-at-simula-uib
Closing date for applications:
Contact: Håvard Raddum
More information: https://www.simula.no/careers/job-openings/postdoctoral-fellows-in-fully-homomorphic-encryption-at-simula-uib
31 January 2026
Jianming Tong, Tianhao Huang, Jingtian Dang, Leo de Castro, Anirudh Itagi, anupam golder, asra ali, Jeremy Kun, jevin jiang, arvind arvind, G. Edward Suh, Tushar Krishna
Yunhao Wang, Katerina Sotiraki, Fan Zhang
In this work, we introduce Dinocchio, the first distributed SNARK for rings with constant proof size and constant verification time. For a setting with $m$ sub-provers, Dinocchio achieves an approximately $m$-fold speedup in prover time compared to Rinocchio (JoC'23), while preserving the constant verification time independent of $m$.
We demonstrate the practicality of Dinocchio through matrix multiplication, which is a crucial building block to large-scale lattice-based applications. With matrices of size $2^{12} \times 2^{12}$, the corresponding arithmetic circuit contains $\sim2^{32}$ constraints, which is beyond the reach of all existing works. Our microbenchmarks show that Dinocchio can generate a succinct proof in around $9.23$ hours with $128$ sub-provers, more than $108\times$ faster than the prior work, and the verifier completes the verification in under $16$ seconds.
Tian Huang, Jiatai Zhang, Megumi Ando
In this work, we introduce the notion of enhanced dialing protocols, a broad class of protocols that enforce the simple I/O setting. We also initiate the first formal study of such protocols with respect to sender anonymity. We introduce a framework that captures three key properties: security, correctness, and fairness. Within this framework, we present Fusion, a protocol that achieves perfect correctness and fairness while incurring only unavoidable leakage, and Fusion+, a differentially private variant that reduces this leakage at the cost of some correctness. Through theoretical analysis, we quantify the fundamental trade-off between privacy and correctness in Fusion+.
Duyên Pay, Thomas Peters, François-Xavier Standaert
Ngoc Khanh Nguyen, George O'Rourke, Jiapeng Zhang
To improve the verification time, we adopt the sumcheck protocol. Note that the standard sumcheck has efficiency bottlenecks for lattice-based constructions, since lattice operations are usually performed over power-of-two cyclotomic rings $\mathbf{R}_{q} := \mathbb{Z}_q[X]/(X^d + 1)$. To address this challenge, we provide a novel approach that integrates Greyhound with the ring-switching idea proposed by Huang, Mao and Zhang (ePrint 2025). Surprisingly, under this approach, the verifier does not need to perform any multiplication over $\mathbf{R}_{q}$, enabling a much faster verification time. This technique could be of independent interest for building lattice-based SNARKs, particularly for achieving faster verification.
As a separate contribution, we introduce a generic reduction that converts polynomial evaluation proofs over extension fields $\mathbb{F}_{q^k}$ (under suitable parameter regimes) into equivalent statements over cyclotomic rings $\mathbf{R}_{q}$. This reduction is compatible with existing lattice-based polynomial commitment schemes and can be integrated as a modular enhancement to broaden applicability to statements over extension fields.
Weiqiang Wen, Jinwei Zheng
Inspired by the equivalence between $\mathsf{LWE}$ and Extrapolated Dihedral Cosets Problem ($\mathsf{EDCP}$) in [Brakerski, Kirshanova, Stehlé and Wen, PKC 2018], we show that the $\mathsf{MLWE}$ problem is as hard as a variant of the $\mathsf{EDCP}$, which we refer to as the structured $\mathsf{EDCP}$ ($\mathsf{stEDCP}$). This extension from $\mathsf{EDCP}$ to $\mathsf{stEDCP}$ relies crucially on the algebraic structure of the ring underlying $\mathsf{MLWE}$: the extrapolation depends not only on the noise rate, but also on the ring’s degree. In fact, an $\mathsf{stEDCP}$ state forms a superposition over an exponential (in ring degree) number of possibilities. Our equivalence result holds for $\mathsf{MLWE}$ defined over power-of-two cyclotomic rings with constant module rank, a setting of particular relevance in cryptographic applications. Moreover, we present a reduction from $\mathsf{stEDCP}$ to $\mathsf{EDCP}$. Therefore, to analyze the quantum hardness of $\mathsf{MLWE}$, it may be advantageous to study $\mathsf{stEDCP}$, which might be easier than $\mathsf{EDCP}$.
Fabio Campos, Daniel Hahn, Daniel Könnecke, Marc Stöttinger
Bhuvnesh Chaturvedi, Ayantika Chatterjee, Anupam Chattopadhyay, Debdeep Mukhopadhyay
Alisée Lafontaine, André Schrottenloher
In this paper, we focus on collision attacks on double-block length hash functions, and more precisely the Hirose compression function (HCF). At ToSC 2021, Chauhan et al. found a 10-round free-start collision attack on HCF-AES-256. At ToSC 2024, Lee and Hong corrected its complexity analysis. However, these two works are superseded by another result of Hirose and Kuwakado (IMACC 2021), which shows that for any $2n$-bit HCF hash function, a quantum free-start collision attack of complexity $\mathcal{O}(2^{n/2})$ exists. While both the works of Chauhan et al. and Lee and Hong are above this generic complexity, we find that a classical attack from Chen et al. (IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci. 2016) translates to a 9-round quantum attack on HCF-AES-256.
Next, we study the security of HCF against quantum collision attacks (not free-start). We use a generic strategy that transforms a partial preimage attack into a quantum collision attack, and give several applications on HCF hash functions: a 6-round attack on AES-256 and a 15-round attack on Romulus (based on Skinny), both exceeding the reach of classical attacks.
Oriol Farràs, Óscar Fidalgo, Carlos Andres Lara-Nino
This work contributes to the study of NCSCs for efficient TIs by finding smaller coverings and proving novel theoretical bounds on their cardinality. We present a new NCSC for the case $t=3,d=2$ that is optimal and NCSCs for the cases $t=3,d=3$ and $t=4,d=2$ whose sizes are close to the lower bounds. We also present new combinatorial properties of these coverings and an algorithm for the search of small NCSCs.
Antoine Bak, Augustin Bariant, Aurélien Boeuf, Maël Hostettler, Guilhem Jazeron
We found CICO solutions to the first 3 proposed instances of Poseidon2-31m and Poseidon2-31k, along with solutions for the first two Poseidon-256 instances. These solutions have been confirmed to be correct and eligible for bounty by the Ethereum fundation, except for the first instance of Poseidon-256, which was claimed by another team before us. In order to solve the instances of Poseidon2-31m and Poseidon2-31k, we used a new resultant-based approach, whereas our attacks on Poseidon-256 only relies on already-known univariate root finding.
Suraj Sharma, Adityavir Singh, Mahabir Prasad Jhanwar
Alberto Centelles, Andrew Mendelsohn
30 January 2026
Mohsen Minaei, Duc V. Le, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez
This paper introduces OptiBridge, a bridge between a payment channel (e.g., Lightning Network) and a smart-contract blockchain (e.g., Ethereum) that preserves safety and liveness without adding trust assumptions and remains fully compatible with existing Lightning and Ethereum stacks. OptiBridge follows an optimistic path in the common case: two honest channel peers materialize the intended state on the destination chain by revealing a pre-agreed secret. To handle faults and adversarial behavior, OptiBridge provides a dispute path orchestrated by a more expressive contract that is deployed {only on demand}. An implementation demonstrates substantial cost savings in the optimistic case: compared to Alba (NDSS’25), the optimistic contract deployment uses $\sim 73\%$ less gas ($1.22$M vs. $4.51$M), and proof submission costs $40{,}107$ vs. $253{,}566$ gas; when disputes arise, the dispute contract deployment costs $2{,}785{,}514$ gas and the core dispute call is cheaper ($196{,}438$ vs.$515{,}860$). Our analysis shows that rational users strictly prefer the optimistic path, whereas the dispute mechanism prevents coin theft and imposes higher fees and delays on the deviator.