International Association
for Cryptologic Research

Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-interactive Arguments of Knowledge (zkSNARKs) are important cryptographic primitives critical in many real-world applications. zkSNARKs are not used in isolation but are deployed within a broader context in which other cryptographic protocols may be concurrently executed. Universal-Composability (UC) allows rigorous analysis of cryptographic primitives being used in such arbitrary contexts. A UC analysis is even more desirable for popular, well-audited, and heavily deployed zkSNARKs already being used in practice. Prior works that study the UC security of existing zkSNARKs (without modifications) are either not modular, hence requiring case-by-case analysis for new proof systems, or have largely focused on zkSNARKs in the Random Oracle Model (ROM). The latter includes zkSNARKs with logarithmic proof sizes compiled from Interactive Oracle Proofs. This state of the art leaves out a large family of very efficient, often constant-size, zkSNARKs that rely on the Algebraic Group Model (AGM) and optionally on the ROM. This includes zkSNARKs compiled from Polynomial Interactive Oracle Proofs, such as Plonk and Marlin, among others. In this work, we address the UC security for unmodified zkSNARKs that are proven secure in AGM (+ROM). Our approach is modular: we identify simple, and mostly standard properties on the underlying zkSNARK that imply UC security. We observe that checking these properties for existing zkSNARKs is a surprisingly simple task using the rigorous formulation of AGM from Jaeger and Mohan (CRYPTO'24). The simplicity and modularity of our framework makes it easy-to-use for concluding UC security of several zkSNARKs in the same setting. Concretely, using our framework we establish that Plonk and Marlin are UC secure without any overhead.

The past several years have seen a rapid rise in practical lattice-based proof systems with linear-sized zero-knowledge proofs forming the foundation of many of the most efficient quantum-safe privacy protocols, and succinct proofs rapidly catching up and surpassing other quantum-safe alternatives in many metrics. A recent comparison of lattice-based aggregate signatures (Ethereum Foundation, 2025) involving the hash-based aggregate signature scheme Plonky3 and the instantiation of aggregate signatures from Falcon from the LaZer lattice library (Lyubashevsky, Seiler, Steuer, CCS 2024) using LaBRADOR (Beullens, Seiler, Crypto 2023), showed that lattice-based constructions have an advantage in terms of proof size and prover time, but are around an order of magnitude slower with regards to verification time. In general, it appears that slower verification times are the main obstacle to the adoption of succinct lattice-based proof systems. In this work, we introduce and implement Orthus, a proof system with sub-linear verification designed for relations that naturally arise in lattice-based constructions. Asymptotically, the verification time grows with the square root of the witness size, and for a concrete example of aggregating Falcon signatures our implementation reduces the verifier running time by a factor of $9X$ when aggregating $2^{17}$ signatures.

Post-quantum signature schemes are becoming increasingly important due to the threat of quantum computers to classical cryptographic schemes. Among the approaches considered in the literature, the MPC-in-the-head paradigm introduced by Ishai et al. (STOC'07) provides an innovative solution for constructing zero-knowledge proofs by exploiting Multi-Party Computation (MPC). This technique has proven to be a versatile tool in order to design efficient cryptographic schemes, including post-quantum signatures. Building on the MPC-in-the-head paradigm, we introduce Bittersweet signatures, a new class of signature schemes based on the Learning With Rounding (LWR) assumption. Their main advantage is conceptual simplicity: by exploiting (almost) key-homomorphic pseudorandom functions (PRFs), a cryptographic object that preserves pseudorandomness while allowing linear operations on keys, we obtain a very regular design offering nice opportunities for parallel implementations. Theoretically, analyzing Bittersweet signatures requires addressing significant challenges related to the (carry) leakage that almost key-homomorphic operations lead to. Concretely, Bittersweet signatures natively lead to competitive signature sizes, trading moderate software performance overheads for hardware performance gains when compared to state-of-the-art MPC-in-the-head schemes (e.g., relying on code-based assumptions), while admittedly lagging a bit behind recent algorithms based on the VOLE-in-the-head or Threshold-Computation-in-the-head frameworks. Besides, their scalability and algebraic structure makes them promising candidates for leakage-resilient implementations. The new abstractions we introduce additionally suggest interesting research directions towards further optimization and generalization.

X-Wing (Barbosa et al., CiC Volume 1, Issue 1) is a hybrid key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) currently considered for standardization by IETF and deployed by major companies such as Google to ensure a secure transition to post-quantum cryptography. It combines a classical X25519 KEM with the post-quantum ML-KEM-768.

In this paper, we propose the first analysis of the anonymity of X-Wing. We are interested in tight and memory-tight reductions that offer stronger security guarantees. We first establish in the standard model that for any IND-CCA secure KEM, weak anonymity implies full anonymity, and our reduction is tight not only in success probability and time but also in memory consumption. We then prove in the random oracle model that X-Wing achieves weak anonymity if both X25519 and ML-KEM-768 are weakly anonymous. The former can even be proven without a hardness assumption.

Our proof on the weak anonymity of X-Wing does not preserve the memory-tightness of the underlying KEMs. To improve it, we propose a slight variant of X-Wing that preserves memory-tightness. Finally, we improve the existing IND-CCA proof of the original X-Wing by Barbosa et al. using our new memory-tight analysis.

AI agents and custodial services are increasingly being entrusted as intermediaries to conduct transactions on behalf of institutions. The stakes are high: The digital asset market is projected to exceed \$16 trillion by 2030, where exchanges often involve proprietary, time-sensitive goods. Although industry efforts like Google’s Agent-to-Payments (AP2) protocol standardize how agents authorize payments, they leave open the core challenge of fair exchange: ensuring that a buyer obtains the asset if and only if the seller is compensated without exposing sensitive information.

We introduce proxy adaptor signatures (PAS), a new cryptographic primitive that enables fair exchange through delegation without sacrificing atomicity or privacy. A stateless buyer issues a single request and does not need to manage long-term cryptographic secrets while proxies complete the exchange with a seller. The seller is guaranteed payment if the buyer can later reconstruct the purchased witness; meanwhile, the proxies remain oblivious to the witness throughout the protocol. We formalize PAS under a threshold model that tolerates the collusion of up to $t-1$ proxies. We also present an efficient construction from standard primitives that is compatible with Bitcoin, Cardano, and Ethereum. Finally, we evaluate a Rust implementation that supports up to 30 proxies. Our prototype is concretely efficient: buyer and seller computations take place in microseconds, proxy operations in milliseconds, and on-chain costs are equivalent to those of a standard transaction without fair exchange.

We present the first vectorized implementation of SQIsign for high-performance Arm architectures. SQIsign is a promising candidate in the NIST On-Ramp Digital Signatures Call Round 2 to its most compact key and signature sizes. However, its signing performance remains a primary bottleneck, particularly the ideal-to-isogeny conversion. The conversion requires a large number of operations on elliptic curves and Abelian varieties, which depend on finite field arithmetic. Despite recent algorithmic improvements, research on high-performance implementations and efficient vectorized finite field arithmetic for SQIsign is still unexplored.

Our main contribution is the first demonstration of non-trivial vectorization speedups for SQIsign. By leveraging the NEON instruction set, we implement highly efficient finite field arithmetic and batched elliptic curve operations tailored for 2-dimensional isogeny chain computations. This accelerates the subroutine by 2.24$\times$ over the state-of-the-art. Moreover, our improvements are completely orthogonal to the recent algorithmic improvement Qlapoti (Asiacrypt 2025), offering similar performance gains in the SQIsign signing algorithm. When combined with Qlapoti, our implementation achieves a speedup of more than 2.24$\times$ in signing at NIST security level I. We expect our work to inspire further SQIsign optimization from a vectorization perspective, especially for quaternion computations with precise bounds.

Modular arithmetic with a large prime modulus is a dominant computational cost in number-theoretic cryptography. Modular operations are especially challenging to parallelize efficiently on CPUs using vector instructions; standard CPU implementations rely on costly carry operations and permutation instructions to align with the multiplication datapath, negating the benefits of vectorization.

We develop vectorized algorithms for modular addition and multiplication, and present a new, constant-time modular multiplication algorithm suitable for general moduli - prime or otherwise. Our method uses a Residue Number System (RNS) representation to align the arithmetic naturally with wide vector units, and strategically eliminate extraneous instructions. Existing works either require the use of customized hardware or fail to show latency improvements.

Reducing the latency of modular arithmetic results in speedups for cryptographic applications. We accelerate RSA-4096 signatures by $4.0\times$ (verify) and $1.3\times$ (sign) over OpenSSL, and speed up BLS signature verifications by $3.43\times$ over the assembly-optimized BLST library. To facilitate broad practical adoption, we plan to upstream our implementation into BoringSSL, where it will directly benefit real-world TLS and cryptographic deployments.

Computing cube roots in quadratic extensions of finite fields is a subroutine that arises in elliptic-curve point decompression, hash-to-curve and isogeny-based protocols. We present a new algorithm that, for $p \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$ –which holds in all settings where $\mathbb{F}_{p^2}$ cube roots arise in practice– reduces the $\mathbb{F}_{p^2}$ cube root to operations entirely in the base field $\mathbb{F}_p$ via the algebraic torus $\mathbb{T}_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$ and Lucas sequences. We prove correctness in all residuosity cases and implement the algorithm using the $\texttt{gnark-crypto}$ open-source library. Benchmarks on six primes spanning pairing-based and isogeny-based cryptography show $1.6$–$2.3\times$ speed-ups over direct (addition chain) exponentiations in $\mathbb{F}_{p^2}$. We also extend the approach to $p \equiv 2 \pmod{3}$ and, more generally, to any odd $n$-th roots in quadratic towers $\mathbb{F}_{p^{2^k}}$ with $\gcd(n, p+1) = 1$.

Succinct arguments based on interactive oracle proofs (IOPs) have achieved remarkable efficiency improvements and are now widely adopted in applications. State-of-the-art IOPs involve protocols for testing proximity to constrained interleaved linear codes, and enjoy essentially optimal parameters. However, recent IOP constructions provide no privacy guarantees, which remain a must for many applications.

We present an IOP of proximity for testing constrained interleaved linear codes that achieves (honest-verifier) zero-knowledge, while incurring a negligible overhead compared to the (non-zero-knowledge) state of the art. In line with recent constructions, our construction satisfies round-by-round knowledge soundness with a straightline extractor and negligible error.

We propose a definition of (honest-verifier) zero-knowledge for interactive oracle reductions (IORs) that we prove is compatible with composition, and then obtain our result by constructing and modularly composing several lightweight zero-knowledge IORs. Our key technical contributions are a zero-knowledge sumcheck IOR and a zero-knowledge code-switching IOR that fit the strict efficiency requirements of our setting; these contributions and other technical complications entailed overcoming several challenges with new notions and protocols. Finally, along the way, we highlight the efficiency benefits of high-distance codes obtained from dispersers, which may be of independent interest.

We study the problem of minimizing round complexity in the context of succinct classical argument systems for quantum computation. All prior works either require at least 8 rounds of interaction between the quantum prover and classical verifier, or rely on the idealized quantum random oracle model (QROM). We design: 1. A 4-round public-coin (except for the first message) argument system for batchQMA lan- guages. Our results come in two flavors: (a) Under the post-quantum hardness of functional encryption and learning with errors (LWE), we achieve optimal communication complexity (i.e., all message sizes are independent of batch size). (b) Under the post-quantum hardness of LWE, we achieve optimal communication com- plexity except for the verifier’s first message. 2. A 6-round private-coin argument system for monotone policy batchQMA languages, under the post-quantum hardness of LWE. The communication complexity is independent of the batch size as well as the monotone circuit size. One of our main technical contributions is a new approach to prove soundness without rewind- ing cheating provers. We bring the notion of straight-line partial extractability to argument systems for quantum computation. All previous works crucially relied on rewinding cheating provers, thus needed “state-preserving” succinct arguments of knowledge (AoKs) for NP to prove soundness.

Anonymous Credentials (or ACs) enable users to prove claims with strong privacy guarantees, protecting credential holders from being tracked by issuers and verifiers. However, these privacy guarantees imply that a credential holder cannot be held accountable for misuse (e.g., selling credential checks online for proving ??? > 18). The lack of accountability may raise questions about the adoption of ACs into national iden- tity systems (e.g., European EUDI or Swiss e-ID), which might lead to the issuing authorities resorting to credential systems with weaker privacy guarantees (e.g., batch issuance of one-show credentials). This shows that the lack of account- ability can adversely impact the levels of privacy enjoyed by users. Hence, in this paper, we discuss transferability attacks on ACs and introduce a framework for providing accountability in AC systems. In addition to issuers, holders and verifiers, it assumes the existence of: (i) a law enforcement body (the police) and a judicial body (the judge) that work together to find information on credential misuse and; (ii) one or more digital privacy advocates, called the NGO(s), that ensure the system is not used for tracking people. We introduce the cryptographic forensic trail (CFT), which is attached to each credential show. The CFT can be used for obtaining more information about an individual if and only if the police have probable cause and can convince the judge to issue a corresponding search warrant. Then, the police, the judge, and the NGO(s) run a multiparty protocol for decrypting relevant trails only. The protocol mimics checks and balances of a healthy democracy, in which neither law enforcement nor justice can track people as they will. Even if both branches colluded, the NGO(s) can detect the misuse and block further use. In addition to possible extensions, we discuss performance constraints on mobile phones and argue that practical feasi- bility of the CFT is within reach.

Determining whether an arbitrary access structure can be realized by an ideal linear secret sharing scheme is an important research topic. we use linear codes as the main tool to construct matrices $H$ and $G$ over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ for a given access structure $\Gamma_{\min}$, and show that a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of an ideal linear secret sharing scheme realizing $\Gamma_{\min}$ is that the equation $GH^{\mathsf{T}}=0$ has a solution. If this equation has a solution, then $H$ serves as the parity-check matrix of a linear code that realizes $\Gamma_{\min}$, and $G$ is the corresponding generator matrix. Furthermore, we prove that the result is equivalent to the following statement: there exists an ideal linear code for realizing the $\Gamma_{\min}$ if and only if it is the port of a matroid that is representable over $\mathbb{F}_q$.

The recent digital signature scheme proposed by Grigoriev, Monico, and Shpilrain (GMS26) attempts to leverage the NP-hardness of tropical matrix factorization as its security foundation. We present a systematic cryptanalysis revealing multiple structural vulnerabilities. First, we demonstrate an existential forgery attack in the chosen-hash model requiring only polynomial-time operations. Second, we establish that the scheme is fundamentally malleable, allowing an adversary to generate arbitrarily many distinct valid signatures for any observed message—thereby breaking strong unforgeability. Third, we show that collecting a polynomial number of honest signatures enables partial key recovery through probabilistic leakage of private key entries. Finally, we present an SMT-based key recovery attack that, given only two valid signatures, recovers the full private key in seconds for the recommended parameters. Our attacks do not rely on solving the claimed NP-hard problem but exploit algebraic properties of the signing equations. Combined, they demonstrate that the scheme fails to achieve the standard security notions of existential unforgeability, strong unforgeability, and key confidentiality.

Quadratic Boolean functions (that is, Boolean functions of algebraic degree at most 2), bent Boolean functions (i.e. maximally nonlinear Boolean functions in even numbers of variables) and, as we prove in this paper, partially-bent Boolean functions (i.e. affine extensions of bent functions to linear super-spaces), share a strong property: all their restrictions to affine hyperplanes are plateaued (i.e. have a Walsh transform valued in a set of the form $\{0,\pm \lambda\}$, where $\lambda$ is a positive integer called the amplitude). In this paper we determine for any $n$ and $k

Deep learning's hunger for high-quality data has catalyzed a burgeoning economy of decentralized data marketplaces. However, a fundamental trust deficit stifles this ecosystem: buyers fear data poisoning, while sellers fear data leakage. Although the Shapley value offers a rigorous economic framework for fair compensation, its calculation traditionally requires a Trusted Third Party (TTP) to access raw data, creating a single point of failure for privacy. Verifying data valuation without compromising confidentiality remains an open challenge.

In this paper, we present ZK-DV, the first Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) system designed for verifiable, privacy-preserving data valuation. ZK-DV enables a seller to prove that a claimed valuation score (based on Gradient Shapley) is mathematically consistent with the underlying private data and the buyer's model, without revealing either. Our key technical insight is the architectural coupling of model training and valuation: we construct a specialized arithmetic circuit that combines the valuation logic into the backpropagation, extracting marginal utility scores from intermediate gradients. This design, implemented via the GKR protocol with a hybrid commitment strategy, amortizes the heavy cryptographic overhead through batched processing. Extensive experiments on the MNIST dataset demonstrate that ZK-DV is practical: by optimizing batch sizes, we achieve a $2.7\times$ speedup in proof generation, while maintaining a quantization fidelity of $\rho=1.0$ and a low verification cost ($< 0.2$s). ZK-DV thus bridges the gap between cryptographic integrity and economic fairness, paving the way for trustless data exchange

This paper introduces the structured generic-group model, an extension of Shoup’s generic-group model (from Eurocrypt 1997) to capture algorithms that take advantage of some non-generic structure of the group. We show that any discrete-log algorithm in a group of prime order $q$ that exploits the structure of at most a $\delta$ fraction of group elements, in a way that we precisely define, must run in time $\Omega(\min(\sqrt{q},1/\delta))$. As an application, we prove a tight subexponential-time lower bound against discrete-log algorithms that exploit the multiplicative structure of smooth integers, but that are otherwise generic. This lower bound applies to a broad class of index-calculus algorithms. We prove similar lower bounds against algorithms that exploit the structure of small integers, smooth polynomials, and elliptic-curve points.

Current industry-standard block cipher modes of operation, such as CBC and GCM, are fundamentally limited by the birthday bound $O(2^{n/2})$, a constraint that has evolved from a theoretical concern into a practical security bottleneck in contemporary high-throughput, high-data-volume environments. To address this, the cryptographic community and NIST are prioritizing Beyond Birthday Bound (BBB) security to extend the operational security margin toward the full block size $O(2^n)$. Achieving BBB security requires a departure from traditional constructions, primarily utilizing three methodologies: XOR of Permutations (XORP), Tweakable Block Ciphers (TBCs), and Fresh Rekeying. While none of these innovative BBB modes have been formally standardized, NIST has initiated the Accordion Mode project, defining a new primitive class: the Tweakable Variable-Input-Length Strong Pseudorandom Permutation (VIL-SPRP). This primitive treats the entire message as a single, indivisible block and expects the submission of BBB-secure variants. To contribute to this standardization effort, we propose a simple BBB-secure variant of the HCTR2 algorithm. We first explain the core BBB methodologies, then discuss the operational mechanism of HCTR2, and finally present our proposed BBB-secure construction.

In this paper, we prove the security of symmetric-key constructions in an adversary model called the Q1MK model, which combines the Q1 model, where the adversary makes classical online queries and quantum offline queries, and the multi-key (multi-user) setting. Specifically, under this model, we prove the security of two symmetric-key constructions: the tweakable Even-Mansour cipher (TEM) and the FX construction (FX), as starting points for understanding the post-quantum security of symmetric-key constructions in this adversary model. Our security proofs are based on the hybrid argument technique introduced by Alagic et al. at EUROCRYPT 2022. First, we prove that in order to break TEM in the Q1MK model, $\Omega(2^{\kappa/3})$ classical and quantum queries are needed, regardless of the number of target $\kappa$-bit keys. Then, before turning to the Q1MK security analysis of FX, we revisit the security proof of FX in the standard Q1 model proposed in version 20230317:200508 of ePrint 2022/1097 and tighten it. By the modified proof, we show that in order to break FX with $(\kappa + n)$-bit secret key in the Q1 model, $\Omega(2^{(\kappa+n)/3})$ classical and quantum queries are needed. We then apply this analysis to the Q1MK setting, and we show that in order to break FX in the Q1MK model, $\Omega(2^{(\kappa + n - u)/3})$ classical and quantum queries are needed, when $2^u$ ($\le 2^{\kappa}$) independent keys are in use.

In this work, we consider dishonest majority MPC protocols with $(1-\epsilon)n$ corrupted parties for some constant $\epsilon\in (0,1/2)$. In this setting, there exist MPC protocols with unanimous abort that achieve constant communication in both online and offline phases via a packed secret sharing scheme. Departing from their approaches, we revisit the ``committee-based'' approach to design an efficient MPC protocol with constant online and offline communication complexity. To balance the communication load of each party, our protocol adopts multiple committees, each of constant size. The computation of circuit $C$ is then divided into layers, each assigned to one committee. To securely transmit messages between committees, we introduce the handoff gates, incurring only a slight communication overhead. Furthermore, we leverage circuit-dependent preprocessing and incremental checking to improve the online efficiency. Compared to other MPC protocols in the same corruption setting, our protocol achieves the smallest concrete total communication complexity. Building upon our multi-committee unanimous-abort protocol, we upgrade it to identifiable abort by adapting a technique from (Rivinius, EUROCRYPT 2025). To integrate this technique into our setting, we adjust the verification timing and introduce a king party to reduce the communication complexity of openings. This yields the first identifiable-abort MPC protocol with constant communication complexity in the sub-optimal dishonest majority setting.

Hierarchical deterministic (HD) wallets, standardized as BIP32, allow users to manage a tree of cryptographic key pairs from a single master seed. A defining feature is non-hardened derivation: child public keys can be derived from a parent public key alone, enabling watch-only wallets where a server generates fresh receiving addresses while the signing key remains offline. Existing constructions rely on the algebraic structure of elliptic curve public keys, and recovering this functionality in the post-quantum setting is an open problem. We present two post-quantum HD wallet constructions. The first uses ML-DSA and supports hardened (private-key-dependent) derivation with proofs of unlinkability and unforgeability. The second, our primary contribution, uses Raccoon-G, a variant of the Raccoon signature scheme with Gaussian-distributed secrets. We modify Raccoon-G to publish full, unrounded public keys, preserving linearity. Since the sum of Gaussians is again Gaussian with predictable wider variance, derived keys remain statistically close to freshly generated ones, enabling non-hardened public key derivation. We prove unlinkability and unforgeability under standard lattice assumptions, and introduce a method for generating rerandomizable Raccoon-G key pairs from fixed randomness with provable existential unforgeability. Both constructions are implemented in Rust. To our knowledge, this is the first post-quantum HD wallet con- struction that recovers BIP32’s full public key derivation functionality with provable security under standard assumptions.