International Association
for Cryptologic Research

Digital identity systems are currently build around the globe, aiming to enable secure, usable, but also privacy-preserving user authentication. Concretely, the EUDI Wallet developed in Europe requires to ensure selective attribute disclosure and unlinkable authentication. This essentially mandates the use of anonymous credentials, that have been developed for this exact purpose over the last 20 years. However, they are not integrated in the current solutions as they lack an essential feature: device binding. That is, binding credentials stored on the users' phones to a secure hardware element therein, in order to prevent credential cloning or sharing. Device binding is typically done through encoding a device public key into the user's credential and requiring a fresh signature under the corresponding and hardware-protected secret key - the proof-of-possession (PoP) - when presenting the credential. While academic solutions exist that realize efficient device binding for anonymous credentials, they are not compatible with the secure hardware currently available in consumer phones. The main challenge lies in the underlying curves: all efficient anonymous credentials, (and their native device binding protocols) require the use of pairing-friendly curves, whereas existing phones are essentially restricted to ECDSA signatures and classic P256 curves.

In this work, we show how to bridge these two systems, enabling device-binding for pairing-based credentials on legacy phones, i.e., relying solely on standard ECDSA signatures for the PoP. We present three different constructions with different trade-offs in efficiency and in protocol complexity. Our most efficient solution generates unlinkable bridging proofs of size ~1.5KB in less than ~500ms by relying on a (very simple) arithmetic circuit, whereas the most conservative approach (without circuits) takes as well ~500ms and comes with proof size of ~175KB. All our solutions share a common blueprint, and we express them in the reductions of knowledge framework (Crypto 2023) to reflect this is in our protocols' design. This framework allows to modularly construct complex zero-knowledge proofs in an elegant and intuitive manner, greatly facilitating the security analysis and the implementation. This framework has previously been mainly used in a theoretical context, and our work demonstrates that it is a powerful tool to design, analyze and implement complex real-world systems.

We study pseudorandomness arising from quartic Dirichlet characters and obtain results that connect analytic and cryptographic perspectives. From an analytic perspective, and following the framework of Mauduit and Sárközy, we define a Boolean function $\psi_\pi$ from the quartic character $\chi_\pi$ modulo a Gaussian prime $\pi$ and analyze sequence $E_{p-1}=(\psi_\pi(1),\ldots,\psi_\pi(p-1))$ for $p=\pi\bar\pi \equiv 1 \bmod{4}$. Using classical character-sum bounds (Pólya-Vinogradov and refinements of Mauduit-Sárközy and Oon), we show that $E_{p-1}$ satisfies $W(E_{p-1}) =O(\sqrt{p}\log p)$ and $C_{\mu}(E_{p-1}) \leq 2^{\frac{\mu}{2}+1} \mu \sqrt{p}\log p,$ which imply strong pseudorandomness for small $\mu$. From the cryptographic side, we resolve an open question posed by Damgård by proving that quartic characters yield the secure pseudorandom generators and weak pseudorandom functions (wPRFs). Adapting similar techniques of Corrigan-Gibbs and Wu, we have shown that distinguishing quartic wPRF implies solving quadratic residuosity, via a chain of polynomial-time reductions. Our results show that under the Quadratic Residuosity Assumption, the quartic character also yields cryptographically secure wPRFs whose one-wayness was assumed in the construction of $\mathsf{Quartapus}$ signature scheme by Brier et al. and the post-quantum secure signature scheme $\mathsf{PorcRoast}_{4}$ by Beullens et al. that are more efficient and secure than legacy schemes based on the Legendre character.

To address the expanding attack surface caused by increasing digitization and interconnection, operators of Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS) adopt security measures already established in information technology, such as Public Key Infrastructure (PKI), to Operational Technology (OT). However, operating a PKI proves to be challenging in complex and heterogeneous IACS landscapes. Hence, operators might rely on external PKI service providers, resulting in new trust dependencies and a loss of direct control over critical security components.

In the WebPKI, Certificate Transparency (CT) is leveraged to monitor the certificate issuance of publicly trusted certificate authorities. Since CT's original WebPKI-centric design and trust assumptions do not align with the isolated and constrained nature of IACS environments, we investigate the adaptation of CT to a private IACS-specific PKI infrastructure operated by a service provider.

We propose amendments to CT processes and roles, an IACS operator-controlled CT infrastructure, and a layered approach to align with ISA/IEC 62443. Despite the lack of CT support by crypto libraries intended for OT devices, we demonstrate the feasibility of our approach by a proof-of-concept implementation.

Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) protocol from delegated committee is an approach in improving the performance and scalability of blockchains. Notable industrial examples include Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) by Tron, Polkadot, and Solana, and Proof-of-Staked-Authority (PoSA) by Binance. In these protocols, a subset of nodes is first selected to form a committee, then the committee members reach an agreement and disseminate the results to all nodes. Although these approaches allow the committee members to be rotated periodically, the security of the system is built upon a strong assumption that no committee can have more than certain fraction of faulty nodes (e.g., one-third in a partially synchronous network).

In this paper, we provide a revamped two-stage design to model BFT from delegated committee without making the strong assumption. Namely, the only assumption is that in a partially synchronous network, the entire system does not have more than one-third faulty nodes. We propose rBFT, a practical BFT protocol that has a fast path where only committee members participate and a slow path where all nodes in the system are involved. We show that, not surprisingly, the fast path is extremely fast, and under reasonable assumptions such as alive-but-corrupt nodes and rational nodes, only fast path can be triggered. Meanwhile, even under conventional Byzantine failures where the slow path is triggered, our protocol is still practical enough.

Integral attacks pose a significant threat to block cipher security, yet providing guarantees against such attacks for a target block cipher is difficult. At ASIACRYPT 2021, Hebborn, Lambin, Leander, and Todo proposed the integral resistance property, which offers strong security guarantees for certain SPN and AND-RX block ciphers, assuming independent round keys. However, limitations remain: they proved a security bound for 13-round Present, while the longest known integral distinguisher covers only 9 rounds. Further, their method cannot tackle complex Feistel structures such as Twine and Lblock. A major challenge in their method is the difficulty of finding key monomials that lead to odd-number monomial trails. We observe that in the first and last parts of the target cipher, many interfering monomials exist that always produce interfering trails, which is a critical reason that makes it difficult to find odd-number monomial trails. Fortunately, we find that these interfering monomials are avoidable by a careful selection of the key monomials. Using this insight, we successfully prove the security of 11-round Present, improving the previous result by 2 rounds, and provide a partial analysis for 10-round Present. We also extend their integral-resistance property to general-Feistel-network (GFN) ciphers Twine and Lblock by proposing an equivalent key transformation method. Through acceleration strategies for identifying key monomials, we confirm, for the first time, that 20-round Twine (out of 36 rounds) and Lblock (out of 32 rounds) are resistant to integral distinguishers. We believe our observations and strategies provide gains to Hebborn et al.’s security guarantees for block ciphers.

Sleepy consensus allows parties to join and leave execution arbitrarily, which is a fundamental requirement for large-scale distributed systems. Classic longest-chain protocols, such as Bitcoin and its variants, achieve consensus under this model but suffer from inherent long latency. In contrast, recent protocols that build upon the classic view-based BFT paradigm can achieve constant expected latency and short best-case latency under optimal resilience, but they often incur high communication cost. We observe that the high communication overhead stems from the time-shifted quorums, a technique that makes quorum certificates transferable under dynamic participation. However, the technique relies on extensive message forwarding to reconcile parties' inconsistent local views, and thus incurs a cubic communication cost unavoidably.

In this work, we tackle the problem by proposing a novel way to transfer certificates. Building on this, we construct a Byzantine Agreement (BA) protocol secure against the state-of-the-art growing adversary model. Our BA protocol achieves optimal resilience, constant expected round complexity, and an expected communication complexity of $O(nNL+nN\kappa+nN\log N)$, where $n$ is the maximum number of awake parties throughout the execution, $N$ is the total number of eligible parties, $L$ is the input length, and $\kappa$ is the security parameter. We also present an efficient recovery mechanism for our BA, incurring only $O(N\kappa+nL)$ bits per recovering party. Then we extend our BA to an Atomic Broadcast (ABC) protocol that achieves optimal resilience, constant expected latency, and an expected amortized communication complexity of $O(nNL+nN\kappa+nN\log N)$ per input value. The recovery mechanism for our ABC incurs $O(N\kappa+n\ell L+n\ell \kappa)$ bits per recovering party, where $\ell$ is the number of views that the party has slept for. Last but not least, we establish communication lower bounds of $\Omega(N^2L)$ for sleepy BA and ABC. The result shows that our BA and ABC are communication-optimal when $L$ is sufficiently large (i.e., when $L=\Omega(\kappa+\log N)$), and highlights a fundamental limitation of communication efficiency in the sleepy model.

Organisations are upgrading their cryptographic infrastructure to become quantum‑safe before large‑scale quantum computers materialise. Post‑quantum cryptography (PQC) standards now exist for key‑exchange and digital signatures, but the urgent question for adopters is how to operationalise PQC in complex environments with confidence. In banking, Transport Layer Security (TLS), for example, protects data‑in‑transit across public‑facing channels and internal services, and is terminated at many heterogeneous endpoints (web servers, API gateways, load balancers, reverse proxies), each a potential quantum‑vulnerable component and migration target.

We argue that the bottleneck is operational rather than algorithmic: hybrid key exchanges such as X25519‑ML‑KEM‑768 are already available in mainstream libraries, but security teams lack precise visibility into TLS configurations and repeatable methods for enabling PQC‑compatible settings across a heterogeneous estate. This paper presents a configuration‑parsing methodology that automatically extracts and normalises TLS cryptographic posture across dominant enterprise web‑server stacks, producing a unified, provenance‑traced cryptographic inventory as a foundation for migration and compliance. We demonstrate the approach on 8,443 real‑world Nginx configurations from public repositories and in a proof‑of‑concept deployment at a financial institution, where ML‑KEM‑512 and X25519‑ML‑KEM‑768 are onboarded at TLS termination points (web server and API gateway) securing an internal application, with zero application‑layer changes and manageable performance overhead.

Proof of Stake (PoS) blockchain systems require weighted threshold signatures where participants’ voting powers reflect their stakes. As stakes change dynamically through deposits and withdrawals, efficient weight and threshold adjustments are essential for maintaining system security and availability without downtime. However, existing approaches face critical limitations: (1) virtualization-based schemes require $O(w)$ operations (signatures) per participant with weight w; (2) dynamic threshold / paricipants schemes do not support weighted participants; (3) schemes with both properties require trusted dealers or $O(n^2)$ re-setup, causing temporary unavailability. This paper introduces Active Weighted Signature (AWS), enabling dynamic adjustments without trusted dealers or re-setup. We propose Generalized Lagrange Interpolation (GLI), encoding weights as polynomial derivatives rather than virtualized participants, and instantiate AWS through ADAPT by applying GLI to the Schnorr-based threshold signature FROST. Our implementation shows that ADAPT achieves comparable efficiency to FROST for key generation, while weight and threshold adjustments complete in 4.1-22.3% of re-setup time. For uneven weight distributions, ADAPT achieves sub-linear scaling: 49× weight difference requires only 3.29× computation versus 49× in virtualization.

Threshold fully homomorphic encryption (ThFHE) enables decryption by collecting decryption shares from any T-out-of-N parties. A major drawback of previous ThFHE schemes is that they require a super-polynomial modulus (or are subject to other limitations), resulting in long ciphertexts, keys, and decryption shares. Passel`egue and Stehl´e (Asiacrypt 2024) proposed a ThFHE scheme in which a semi-trusted server rounds the input ciphertexts to produce polynomially short ciphertexts and sends them to the parties, thereby making the rest of the decryption process efficient. Although the input ciphertexts are still super-polynomially large, the communication cost of sending them from the parties to the server can be reduced to polynomial size via the transciphering technique; as a result, an entirely low-communication ThFHE is achieved. However, if even a single party colludes with the server (contrary to the assumption), the secret key can be efficiently recovered. Such a risky scenario would be unsuitable for practical deployment.

In this paper, we tackle this issue. We propose two serverless ThFHE schemes with polynomially short decryption shares. The core idea is to let the parties directly round the decryption shares, rather than rely on the semi-trusted server to round the ciphertexts. We can also achieve low-communication ThFHE by reducing the communication required to send input ciphertexts to the parties to polynomial size via transciphering. Our first scheme, based on binary coefficient linear secret sharing ({0,1}-LSS), strictly improves upon Boneh et al. (CRYPTO 2018), achieving short decryption shares without any trade-offs. Our second scheme, based on Shamir secret sharing, adapts the technique of Okada and Takagi (Asiacrypt 2025) to eliminate the $O(N^{4.3})$ overhead in share size of our first scheme, further reducing communication costs.

Recently, Gentry and Lee (GL) proposed a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) scheme optimized for matrix arithmetic. In this paper, we propose an efficient bootstrapping technique for the GL scheme. Our core idea leverages the linearity of the slot--coefficient transformations, namely CtS and StC: we formulate these operations as ciphertext--plaintext matrix multiplications, which are natively supported by the GL scheme. As a result, the proposed method reduces the number of key-switching operations per step to a small constant. To enable this, we first generalize the GL scheme to matrices of non-power-of-two dimensions by introducing a generalized definition of the trace over commutative rings and proving that it commutes with decryption. Our bootstrapping adopts the CKKS paradigm: ModRaise, CtS, EvalMod and StC. Typically, CtS/StC and EvalMod dominate runtime and depth, respectively; our optimization shifts the bottleneck to EvalMod for both. A proof-of-concept implementation shows that linear transformations account for 20.1% of the total bootstrapping time, compared to 54.9-71.7% in prior CKKS bootstrapping, and that, despite lacking low-level optimizations, our amortized CtS runtime is still about 3 times faster than the well-optimized library (Lattigo).

We introduce YsPIR, a single-server private information retrieval (PIR) protocol that improves upon the state-of-the-art KsPIR protocol by Luo, Liu, and Wang (CCS 2024) in server response time and offline communication. YsPIR is built on a new first-dimension folding technique, which reduces online computation time and decreases the public-key material required in the offline phase.

Our approach has three main advantages. First, it enables the most resource-intensive computations to be preprocessed offline, thereby reducing online response time. Second, its offline communication is independent of the database size and remains small. Third, it maintains low communication cost even under high-throughput settings.

We conduct comprehensive experiments to evaluate the concrete performance of YsPIR. The results show that YsPIR achieves approximately 1.64x higher online throughput and reduces offline communication by about 3.09x compared with KsPIR.

Falcon is a lattice-based digital signature scheme offering excellent performance and key sizes, and it has been selected for standardization by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as part of their post-quantum standardization project. However, the use of floating-point and/or fixed-point arithmetic in Falcon presents unique challenges. One such challenge is the lack of reproducibility, which can arise due to the inexact representation of fractional numbers. Traditionally, implementations are validated for correctness using Known Answer Tests (KATs), but this approach requires exact reproducibility. We propose a novel alternate procedure for validating the correctness of Falcon’s key generation. Our procedure never rejects correct implementations of Falcon that vary due to the numerical instability of floating and fixed-point arithmetic. It is still strict enough to guarantee that differences in generated keys due to these variations will not create security problems, although like all black-box testing methods, it does not rule out security problems due to other implementation characteristics, such as side channels. Combined with black-box conformance testing on signing and verification, this provides a path for validating the correctness of Falcon implementations on defined platforms. We further study Falcon’s keys by defining and computing perfect keys that are generated using infinite precision. Last, we estimate the total number of valid keys that could be generated from a single seed. Our work is based on extensive experiments for which the code is available.

The study of digital signatures with tight reductions has attracted considerable attention over the past two decades, as such schemes inherit essentially the same quantitative hardness as the underlying computational problem. In the context of lattice-based cryptography, the GPV approach (Gentry, Peikert, and Vaikuntanathan, STOC ’08) admits a simple tight reduction from the SIS problem, but relies on preimage sampling via trapdoors, which often leads to complex and brittle implementations. By contrast, tight proofs for trapdoor-free constructions, following the Fiat–Shamir paradigm, necessarily rely on decisional assumptions, most notably the decisional LWE assumption. From the perspective of concrete security, however, reliance on a search assumption is preferable, as known search-to-decision reductions for LWE provide only weak quantitative guarantees.

This paper presents the first efficient lattice-based signature scheme with a tight reduction to a search assumption (namely, the hardness of the search LWE problem) that does not require any trapdoor in the scheme itself (but merely uses, instead, a trapdoor in the proof). Our construction follows the Fiat-Shamir paradigm and can be viewed as a lattice analogue of Chevallier–Mames signatures (CRYPTO ’05). Establishing security in the lattice setting, however, requires overcoming significant technical obstacles: in particular, our proof develops several new techniques to cope with the inherently weak soundness guarantees of lattice-based interactive proofs.

It is getting widely recognized that quantum computers pose a fundamental threat to blockchain security. The transaction signature transition to Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) is therefore an urgent challenge. However, it remains unclear how much quantum computing power would be sufficient to compromise blockchain security and, consequently, by when the transition should be completed. To address these questions theoretically, we first formalize the signature transition process and the quantum adversary based on the well-known Bitcoin backbone protocol framework. We then establish a threshold for the chain's tolerable quantum adversary capability. Specifically, we prove that a security property migration liveness holds with overwhelming probability if and only if $$ \Delta_{\mathrm{eff}} \;\geq\; \left\lceil \frac{4}{(1 - \epsilon)f} \right\rceil, $$ where $\Delta_{\mathrm{eff}}$ is the number of rounds the quantum adversary needs to produce a forged transaction after the broadcast of a migration transaction, $f$ is the honest mining success probability, and $\epsilon$ is the concentration quality of the underlying random variables. We further generalize the analysis to derive a relationship between the transition process and the tolerable quantum adversary capability, providing a theoretical basis for designing secure signature transition plans.

Protocols for Byzantine agreement are known to be constrained by relatively strong lower bounds on their optimal resilience, round complexity, and communication complexity. Crucially, though, these lower bounds do not immediately rule out the possibility of protocols that are faster and use less communication when the actual number of faults $f$ is less than the maximum number of faults $t$ that can be sustained. Early-stopping protocols terminate in a number of rounds proportional to $f$ (rather than $t$); likewise, protocols with adaptive communication incur asymptotically less communication when $f$ is less than $t$. We present a randomized, early-stopping Byzantine agreement protocol with adaptive communication complexity that terminates in $O(f+1)$ rounds with bit complexity $O((f+1)n\kappa)$ for a failure probability of $2^{-\kappa}$ in a synchronous network with $t

Directive (EU) 2019/1937 mandates reporting channels that do substantially more than accept a one-shot anonymous report submission. A compliant system must protect the confidentiality of the report and the reporting person, restrict submission to entitled persons, enforce prescribed workflows under statutory deadlines, and maintain auditable records of the reporting process. Existing whistleblowing tools typically address only fragments of these requirements, often reducing the problem to an anonymous inbox or web form. To our knowledge, no existing system addresses whistleblowing's full procedural and security requirements within a single integrated design.

We adopt a compliance-driven approach in which the Directive is treated as a normative source of system requirements rather than as background motivation. From Directive-mandated procedures, assets, and threats we derive, we propose a threat model, a set of security goals tailored to directive-compliant whistleblowing, and formalize the whistleblowing process.

We then propose a concrete Whistleblowing System architecture that separates enrollment from reporting and builds on an Auditable Log Service (ALS) with an Identity Management Component (IMC). Our design supports report pseudonyms tied to entitled persons, controlled identity disclosure, and confidential yet accountable communication. It enforces an auditable workflow that separates procedural handling from merits-based processing and enables a practical deployment model deployable at both state and organization level that distributes trust across multiple entities, lowers adoption barriers through shared infrastructure, and supports two-level auditing of both procedural compliance and merits-based handling for dispute resolution.

The security of classical symmetric-key primitives is fundamentally challenged by the emergence of quantum computing, necessitating a rigorous evaluation of their post-quantum resilience. This paper presents a comprehensive quantum circuit realization and Grover cryptanalysis of GFSPX, a lightweight block cipher featuring a 64-bit data block and a 128-bit secret key. GFSPX utilizes a unique hybrid architecture that integrates a 4-branch generalized Feistel structure with both Addition-Rotation-XOR (ARX) and Substitution-Permutation Network (SPN) components. Our quantum implementation optimizes resource distribution by exploiting the inherent reversibility of the Feistel network and employing a compact ripple-carry adder for the ARX layers. The proposed architecture achieves a qubit-optimized footprint of 209 qubits with a baseline quantum cost of 32,498 and a circuit depth of 7,617. To evaluate the cipher’s resistance against quantum adversaries, we construct a parallelized Grover oracle using three plaintextciphertext pairs to eliminate spurious matches. Our analysis reveals that the total quantum cost of a key-recovery attack on GFSPX is 1.12 × 2^{159} quantum gates. Although this cost falls below the NIST Level 1 security threshold of 2^{170}, the hybrid ARX-SPN design demonstrates a higher quantum attack resistance among other lightweight designs. These findings provide critical insights into the balance between classical efficiency and quantum resilience in next-generation cryptographic designs for resource-constrained environments.

The Winternitz One-Time Signature~(WOTS) scheme is a fundamental primitive in post-quantum cryptography that relies solely on the security of its hash function, has been standardized, and serves as a critical building block for standardized hash-based signatures such as XMSS, LMS, and SPHINCS. However, schemes are traditionally analyzed under the assumption that their private keys are correctly utilized and kept secure. This assumption is broken when facing an adversary with high surveillance capabilities that can order the disclosure of users' private keys. Anamorphic cryptography is a branch of covert communication research that investigates how cryptography operates in such adversarial settings. In this article, we propose the first anamorphic constructions for the WOTS family of signature schemes and show that these constructions are indistinguishable from their traditional counterparts. We formalize these constructions within a game-based framework and prove their security under standard anamorphic assumptions, showing that the resulting schemes satisfy anamorphic indistinguishability. Lastly, we briefly discuss and compare the anamorphic length capabilities and the characteristics of each construction method. Our results show that WOTS and its variants can support an anamorphic covert channel that is resilient in highly adversarial environments.

The BLS digital signature scheme, in particular its instantiation with the BLS12-381 curve, has become a cornerstone of modern blockchain protocols such as Ethereum Proof-of-Stake, due to its unique and attractive characteristics (e.g., support for non-interactive signature aggregation). Recently, Cheng et al. (CHES 2025) demonstrated that the enormous Single-Instruction-Multiple-Data (SIMD) computing power of the Intel AVX-512 extensions, when combined with carefully-designed vectorization strategies, can be effectively leveraged to speed up the computation of the optimal ate pairing on BLS12-381, a major component of BLS. This naturally raises the question of whether such SIMD-parallel processing can be exploited more extensively to benefit the entire BLS signature scheme. The present paper answers this question positively by presenting a highly SIMD-optimized BLS implementation using Intel AVX-512, especially the AVX-512IFMA instructions. In order to harness AVX-512 more efficiently for the performance-critical operations of BLS, we explored a wide range of optimization options, including various formulas and vectorization granularities for elliptic curve arithmetic operations, scalar multiplication, and hash-to-curve, as well as the fine-tuning and flexible use of different implementations of the finite-field arithmetic. Benchmarking results collected on an Intel Core i3-1005G1 ("Ice Lake") CPU show that our vectorized BLS software using AVX-512 is at least 1.57 times faster than an x64 assembly implementation of the widely-used blst library.

Threshold public-key encryption schemes enable decryption only with the participation of enough partial secret key holders. In this article, we propose the first dedicated protocol for distributed decryption of HQC ciphertexts. This protocol is perfectly correct and does not leak any information about the shared secret key. This leads to the first threshold cryptosystem based on HQC. To this end, we present protocols for securely decoding shared erroneous words of both Reed-Muller and Reed-Solomon codes. Such decodings require to develop novel techniques for specific multiparty computations in fields of characteristic 2. For distributed Reed-Muller decoding, we develop a majority computing protocol. For distributed Reed-Solomon decoding, we propose a novel protocol for securely solving Padé approximants over shared polynomials. Beyond their immediate application to HQC, our results enable new techniques in secure distributed computation over structured algebraic objects, and may find independent applications in advanced cryptographic protocols.