International Association
for Cryptologic Research

Event date: 7 June to 11 June 2021
Submission deadline: 8 January 2021
Notification: 22 February 2021

Proof of Work (PoW) protocols, originally proposed to circumvent DoS and email spam attacks, are now at the heart of the majority of recent cryptocurrencies. Current popular PoW protocols are based on hash puzzles. These puzzles are solved via a brute force search for a hash output with particular properties, such as a certain number of leading zeros. By considering the hash as a random function, and fixing a priori a sufficiently large search space, Grover's search algorithm gives an asymptotic quadratic advantage to quantum machines over classical machines. In this paper, as a step towards a fuller understanding of post quantum blockchains, we propose a PoW protocol for which quantum machines have a smaller asymptotic advantage. Specifically, for a lattice of rank \(n\) sampled from a particular class, our protocol provides as the PoW an instance of the Hermite Shortest Vector Problem (Hermite-SVP) in the Euclidean norm, to a small approximation factor. Asymptotically, the best known classical and quantum algorithms that directly solve SVP type problems are heuristic lattice sieves, which run in time \(2^{0.292n + o(n)}\) and \(2^{0.265n + o(n)}\) respectively. We discuss recent advances in SVP type problem solvers and give examples of where the impetus provided by a lattice based PoW would help explore often complex optimization spaces.

The random oracle model (ROM) enjoys widespread popularity, mostly because it tends to allow for tight and conceptually simple proofs where provable security in the standard model is elusive or costly. While being the adequate replacement of the ROM in the post-quantum security setting, the quantum-accessible random oracle model (QROM) has thus far failed to provide these advantages in many settings. In this work, we focus on adaptive reprogrammability, a feature of the ROM enabling tight and simple proofs in many settings. We show that the straightforward quantum-accessible generalization of adaptive reprogramming is feasible by proving a bound on the adversarial advantage in distinguishing whether a random oracle has been reprogrammed or not. We show that our bound is tight by providing a matching attack. We go on to demonstrate that our technique recovers the mentioned advantages of the ROM in three QROM applications:

1) We give a tighter proof of security of the message compression routine as used by XMSS. 2) We show that the standard ROM proof of chosen-message security for Fiat-Shamir signatures can be lifted to the QROM, straightforwardly, achieving a tighter reduction than previously known. 3) We give the first QROM proof of security against fault injection and nonce attacks for the hedged Fiat-Shamir transform.

This paper gives the first definitions and constructions for incremental pseudo-random functions (IPRFs). The syntax is nonce based. (Algorithms are deterministic but may take as input a non-repeating quantity called a nonce.) The design approach is modular. First, given a scheme secure only in the single-document setting (there is just one document on which incremental updates are being performed) we show how to generically build a scheme that is secure in the more realistic multi-document setting (there are many documents, and they are simultaneously being incrementally updated). Then we give a general way to build an IPRF from (1) an incremental hash function with weak collision resistance properties and (2) a symmetric encryption scheme. (This adapts the classic Carter-Wegman paradigm used to build message authentication schemes in the non-incremental setting.) This leads to many particular IPRFs. Our work has both practical and theoretical motivation and value: Incremental PRFs bring the benefits of incrementality to new applications (such as incremental key derivation), and the movement from randomized or stateful schemes to nonce based ones, and from UF (unforgeability) to PRF security, bring incremental symmetric cryptography up to speed with the broader field of symmetric cryptography itself.

The six infinite families of power APN functions are among the oldest known instances of APN functions, and it has been conjectured in 2000 that they exhaust all possible power APN functions. Another long-standing open problem is that of the Walsh spectrum of the Dobbertin power family, which is the only one among the six families for which it remains unknown. In this paper, we derive alternative representations for functions from the infinite APN monomial families, with the hope that this will pave the way for further progress in this area. More concretely, we show how the Niho, Welch, and Dobbertin functions can be represented as the composition $x^i \circ x^{1/j}$ of two power functions, and prove that our representations are the simplest possible in the sense that no two power functions of lesser algebraic degree can produce the same composition. We also investigate compositions of the form $x^i \circ L \circ x^{1/j}$ for a linear polynomial $L$, and computationally determine all APN functions of this form for $n \le 9$ and for $L$ with coefficients in $\mathbb{F}_2$ in order to confirm that our theoretical constructions exhaust all possible cases. We present some observations and computational data on power functions with exponent of the form $\sum_{i = 1}^{k-1} 2^{2ni} - 1$, which can be seen as generalizations of both the inverse and the Dobbertin APN families. Finally, we present our computational data on the Walsh coefficients of the Dobbertin function over $\F$ for $n \le 35$, and conjecture the exact form of its Walsh spectrum.

The existence of a provable one-way function is a long-standing open problem. This short note presents an example towards the existence a provable one-way function, example in which both directions are polynomial. Namely, we prove that given a sorted array it takes O(n) operations to randomly permute the array values uniformly over the permutation space, while (comparison based) sorting of the permuted array (of big enough values) requires in the worst case (and in the average case) Omega(n log n) compare operations . We also present a candidate cryptosystem based on permutations of random polynomial values.

Recent research in Dynamic Searchable Symmetric Encryption (DSSE) focuses on efficient search over encrypted data while allowing updates. Unfortunately, as demonstrated by many attacks, updates can be a source of information leakage that can compromise DSSE privacy. To mitigate these attacks, forward and backward privacy of DSSE schemes have been introduced. A concerted effort of the research community has resulted in the publication of many DSSE schemes. To the best of our knowledge, however, there is no DSSE scheme supporting conjunctive queries, which achieves both forward and backward privacy.

We give two DSSE schemes with forward and backward privacy, which support conjunctive queries, and they are suitable for different applications. In particular, we first introduce a new data structure termed the extended bitmap index. Then we describe our forward and backward private DSSE schemes, which support conjunctive queries. Our security analysis proves the claimed privacy characteristics, and experiments show that our schemes are practical. Compared to the state-of-the-art DSSE VBTree supporting conjunctive queries (but not backward privacy), our schemes offer search time that is a few orders of magnitude faster. Besides, our schemes claim better security (called Type-C backward privacy).

In this paper we introduce new algorithms that, based only on the independent round keys assumption, allow to practically compute the exact expected differential probability of (truncated) differentials and the expected linear potential of (multidimensional) linear hulls. That is, we can compute the exact sum of the probability or the potential of all characteristics that follow a given activity pattern. We apply our algorithms to various recent SPN ciphers and discuss the results.

We introduce a novel variant of Lagrange interpolation called modular Lagrange interpolation that allows us to obtain and prove error bounds for explicit low-degree polynomial approximations of a function on a union of equally-spaced small intervals even if the function overall is not continuous. We apply our technique to the mod function and obtain explicit low-degree polynomial approximations with small error. In particular, for every $k$ and $N >>k$, we construct low-degree polynomials that approximate $f(x)\:=\: x$ mod $N$, for $|f(x)| \leq 1$ and $|x| \leq kN$, to within O($1/N$) additive approximation. For $k= O(\log N)$, the result is generalized to give O($d$)-degree polynomial approximations to within O($N^{-d}$) error for any $d \geq 1$. Literature in approximation theory allows for arbitrary precision polynomial approximation of only smooth functions, whereas the mod function is only piecewise linear. These polynomials can be used in bootstrapping for approximate homomorphic encryption, which requires computing the mod function near multiples of the modulus. Our work bypasses the fundamental error of approximation in prior works caused by first approximating the mod function by a scaled sine function. For typical settings of $N$, these polynomials have lower error than the fundamental error introduced by using the scaled sine function at degrees computable in multiplicative depth seven or eight.

We present two new related families of lattice trapdoors based on the inhomogeneous NTRU problem (iNTRU) defined in Genise et. al (ASIACRYPT 2019). Our constructions are ``gadget-based'' and offer compact secret keys and preimages and compatibility with existing, efficient preimage sampling algorithms. Our trapdoors can be used as a fundamental building block in lattice-based schemes relying lattice trapdoors. In addition, we implemented our trapdoors using the PALISADE library.

There are lots of applications of inner-product functional encryption (IPFE). In this paper, we consider two important extensions of it. One is to enhance IPFE with access control such that only users with a pre-defined identity are allowed to compute the inner product, referred as identity-based inner-product functional encryption (IBIPFE). We formalize the definition of IBIPFE, and propose the first adaptive-secure IBIPFE scheme from Decisional Bilinear Diffie-Hellman (DBDH) assumption. In an IBIPFE scheme, the ciphertext is related to a vector $\vec{x}$ and a new parameter, identity ID. Each secret key is also related to a vector $\vec{y}$ and an identity ID'. The decryption algorithm will output the inner-product value $⟨x, y⟩$ only if ID $=$ ID. The other extension is to make IBIPFE leakage resilient. We consider the bounded-retrieval model (BRM) in which an adversary can learn at most $l$ bits information from each secret key. Here, $l$ is the leakage bound determined by some external parameters, and it can be set arbitrarily large. After giving the security definition of leakage-resilient IBIPFE, we extend our IBIPFE scheme into a leakage-resilient IBIPFE scheme in the BRM by hash proof system (HPS).

Byzantine Broadcast is an important topic in distributed systems and improving its round complexity has long been a focused challenge. Under honest majority, the state of the art for Byzantine Broadcast is 10 rounds for a static adversary and 16 rounds for an adaptive adversary. In this paper, we present a Byzantine Broadcast protocol with expected 8 rounds under a static adversary and expected 10 rounds under an adaptive adversary. We also generalize our idea to the dishonest majority setting and achieve an improvement over existing protocols.

Most efficient zero-knowledge arguments lack a concrete security analysis, making parameter choices and efficiency comparisons challenging. This is even more true for non-interactive versions of these systems obtained via the Fiat-Shamir transform, for which the security guarantees generically derived from the interactive protocol are often too weak, even when assuming a random oracle.

This paper initiates the study of {\em state-restoration soundness} in the algebraic group model (AGM) of Fuchsbauer, Kiltz, and Loss (CRYPTO '18). This is a stronger notion of soundness for an interactive proof or argument which allows the prover to rewind the verifier, and which is tightly connected with the concrete soundness of the non-interactive argument obtained via the Fiat-Shamir transform.

We propose a general methodology to prove tight bounds on state-restoration soundness, and apply it to variants of Bulletproofs (Bootle et al, S\&P '18) and Sonic (Maller et al., CCS '19). To the best of our knowledge, our analysis of Bulletproofs gives the {\em first} non-trivial concrete security analysis for a non-constant round argument combined with the Fiat-Shamir transform.

Many organizations stand to benefit from pooling their data together in order to draw mutually beneficial insights -- e.g., for fraud detection across banks, better medical studies across hospitals, etc. However, such organizations are often prevented from sharing their data with each other by privacy concerns, regulatory hurdles, or business competition.

We present Senate, a system that allows multiple parties to collaboratively run analytical SQL queries without revealing their individual data to each other. Unlike prior works on secure multi-party computation (MPC) that assume that all parties are semi-honest, Senate protects the data even in the presence of malicious adversaries. At the heart of Senate lies a new MPC decomposition protocol that decomposes the cryptographic MPC computation into smaller units, some of which can be executed by subsets of parties and in parallel, while preserving its security guarantees. Senate then provides a new query planning algorithm that decomposes and plans the cryptographic computation effectively, achieving a performance of up to 145$\times$ faster than the state-of-the-art.

In this paper, we investigate the key dependency of differentials in block ciphers by examining the results of numerous experiments applied to the substitution-permutation network (SPN) structure using 4-bit S-boxes. In particular, we consider two cipher structures: a toy 16-bit SPN and a realistic 64-bit SPN. For both ciphers, we generate many different experimental results by inserting the S-boxes used in many lightweight cipher proposals and applying different forms of round key generation. It is demonstrated that, in most circumstances, with enough rounds in the cipher, the probability distribution (across all keys) of the differential probability follows the distribution expected in the theoretically ideal scenario. However, this does not occur consistently for all S-boxes and all approaches to round key generation. Consequently, it is possible that a cipher may have more susceptibility to differential cryptanalysis for some subset of the cipher keys than is implied when employing the standard assumptions used in analyzing a cipher’s security.

We introduce Vetted Encryption (VE), a novel cryptographic primitive, which addresses the following scenario: a receiver controls, or vets, who can send them encrypted messages. We model this as a filter publicly checking ciphertext validity, where the overhead does not grow with the number of senders. The filter receives one public key for verification, and every user receives one personal encryption key.

We present three versions: Anonymous, Identifiable, and Opaque VE (AVE, IVE and OVE), and concentrate on formal definitions, security notions and examples of instantiations based on preexisting primitives of the latter two. For IVE, the sender is identifiable both to the filter and the receiver, and we make the comparison with identity-based signcryption. For OVE, a sender is anonymous to the filter, but is identified to the receiver. OVE is comparable to group signatures with message recovery, with the important additional property of confidentiality of messages.

In this paper we examine the central question that is how well do side channel evaluation regimes capture the true security level of a product. Concretely, answering this question requires considering the optimality of the attack/evaluation strategy selected by the evaluator, and the various steps to instantiate it. We draw on a number of published works and discuss whether state-of-the-art solutions for the different steps of a side-channel security evaluation offer bounds or guarantees of optimality, or if they are inherently heuristic. We use this discussion to provide an informal rating of the steps' optimality and to put forward where risks of overstated security levels remain.

SodsMPC is a quantum-safe smart contract system. SodsMPC permissioned servers (verification nodes) execute contracts by secure multi-party computation (MPC) protocols. MPC ensures the contract execution correctness while trivially keeping the \textit{data privacy}. Moreover, SodsMPC accomplishes the contract \textit{business logic privacy} while protecting the contract user \textit{anonymous identity} simultaneously. We express the logic of a contract by a finite state machine (FSM). A state transition of the FSM is represented by a \textit{blind polynomial} with secret-shared coefficients. When using MPC to compute this blind polynomial, the contract business logic privacy is obtained. These coefficients which control the logic are binary secret shares. We also propose a base conversion method among binary and integer secret shares by MPC. Our contract anonymity comes from the ``mixing-then-contract'' paradigm. The online phase of the SodsMPC mixing is a multiplication between a preprocessed permutation matrix and an input vector in the form of secret sharing, which accomplishes a fully randomized shuffle of the inputs and keeps the secret share form for the following contract execution. All SodsMPC components, including a verifiable secret sharing scheme, are quantum-safe, asynchronous, coping with $t<n/3$ compromised servers, and robust (tolerates Byzantine servers) in both preprocessing and online phases.

Adaptor signatures (AS) are an extension of digital signatures that enable the encoding of a cryptographic hard problem (e.g., discrete logarithm) within the signature itself. An AS scheme ensures that (i) the signature can be created only by the user knowing the solution to the cryptographic problem; (ii) the signature reveals the solution itself; (iii) the signature can be verified with the standard verification algorithm. These properties have made AS a salient building block for many blockchain applications, in particular, off-chain payment systems such as payment-channel networks, payment-channel hubs, atomic swaps or discrete log contracts. Current AS constructions, however, are not secure against adversaries with access to a quantum computer.

In this work, we present IAS, a construction for adaptor signatures that relies on standard cryptographic assumptions for isogenies, and builds upon the isogeny-based signature scheme CSI-FiSh. We formally prove the security of IAS against a quantum adversary. We have implemented IAS and our evaluation shows that IAS can be incorporated into current blockchains while requiring $\sim1500$ bytes of storage size on-chain and $\sim140$ milliseconds for digital signature verification. We also show how IAS can be seamlessly leveraged to build post-quantum off-chain payment applications such as payment-channel networks without harming their security and privacy.

This is an exciting opportunity to join the University of Birmingham’s Centre for Cyber Security and Privacy on an exciting EPSRC funded project ‘CAP-TEE: Capability Architectures in Trusted Execution’. Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) shield computations using security-sensitive data (e.g. personal data, banking information, or encryption keys) inside a secure "enclave" from the rest of the untrusted operating system. A TEE protects its data and code even if an attacker has gained full root access to the untrusted parts of the system. Today, TEEs like ARM Trustzone and Intel SGX are therefore widely used in general-purposes devices, including most laptops and smartphones. But with increasingly widespread use, TEEs have proven vulnerable to a number of hardware and software-based attacks, often leading to the complete compromise of the protected data. In this project, we will use capability architectures (as e.g. developed by the CHERI project) to protect TEEs against such state-of-the-art attacks. We address a wide range of threats from software vulnerabilities such as buffer overflows to sophisticated hardware attacks like fault injection. CAP-TEE will provide a strong, open-source basis for the future generation of more secure TEEs. When developing such disruptive technologies, it is key to minimise the efforts for porting existing codebases to the new system to facilitate adoption in practice. In CAP-TEE, we therefore focus on techniques to ease the transition to our capability-enabled TEE. In industrial cases studies for the automotive and rail sector, we will demonstrate how complex code written in a memory-unsafe language like C(++) can be seamlessly moved to our platform to benefit from increased security without a full redesign. The successful candidate will be based at the School of Computer Science as part of the Centre for Cyber Security and Privacy and will be working closely with Dr David Oswald. The centre is recognised by NCSC and EPSRC as an Academic Centre of Excellence in Cyber Security Research. 

Closing date for applications:

Contact: Dr David Oswald

More information: https://www.jobs.ac.uk/job/CCF964/research-felllow-in-cyber-security