International Association
for Cryptologic Research

We show that there exists a unitary quantum oracle relative to which quantum commitments exist but no (efficiently verifiable) one-way state generators exist. Both have been widely considered candidates for replacing one-way functions as the minimal assumption for cryptography—the weakest cryptographic assumption implied by all of computational cryptography. Recent work has shown that commitments can be constructed from one-way state generators, but the other direction has remained open. Our results rule out any black-box construction, and thus settle this crucial open problem, suggesting that quantum commitments (as well as its equivalency class of EFI pairs, quantum oblivious transfer, and secure quantum multiparty computation) appear to be strictly weakest among all known cryptographic

While in classical cryptography, one-way functions (OWFs) are widely regarded as the “minimal assumption,” the situation in quantum cryptography is less clear. Recent works have put forward two concurrent candidates for the minimal assumption in quantum cryptography: One-way state generators (OWSGs), postulating the existence of a hard search problem with an efficient verification algorithm, and EFI pairs, postulating the existence of a hard distinguishing problem. Two recent papers [Khurana and Tomer STOC’24; Batra and Jain FOCS’24] showed that OWSGs imply EFI pairs, but the reverse direction remained open. In this work, we give strong evidence that the opposite direction does not hold: We show that there is a quantum unitary oracle relative to which EFI pairs exist, but OWSGs do not. In fact, we show a slightly stronger statement that holds also for EFI pairs that output classical bits (QEFID). As a consequence, we separate, via our oracle, QEFID, and one-way puzzles from OWSGs and several other Microcrypt primitives, including efficiently verifiable one-way puzzles and unclonable state generators. In particular, this solves a problem left open in [Chung, Goldin, and Gray Crypto’24]. Using similar techniques, we also establish a fully black-box separation (which is slightly weaker than an oracle separation) between private-key quantum money schemes and QEFID pairs. One conceptual implication of our work is that the existence of an efficient verification algorithm may lead to qualitatively stronger primitives in quantum cryptography.

In this work, we put forth the notion of dynamic zk-SNARKs. A dynamic zk-SNARK is a zk-SNARK that has an additional update algorithm. The update algorithm takes as input a valid source statement-witness pair $(x,w)\in \mathcal{L}$ along with a verifying proof $\pi$, and a valid target statement-witness pair $(x',w')\in \mathcal{L}$. It outputs a verifying proof $\pi'$ for $(x',w')$ in sublinear time (for $(x,w)$ and $(x',w')$ with small Hamming distance) potentially with the help of a data structure. To the best of our knowledge, none of the commonly-used zk-SNARKs are dynamic---a single update in $(x,w)$ can be handled only by recomputing the proof, which requires at least linear time. After presenting the formal definition of dynamic zk-SNARKs, we provide two constructions. The first one is based on recursive SNARKs and has $O(\log n)$ update time. However it suffers from heuristic security---it must encode the random oracle in the SNARK circuit. The second one and our central contribution, $\mathsf{Dynaverse}$, is based solely on KZG commitments and has $O(\sqrt{n}\log n)$ update time. Our preliminary evaluation shows, that, while worse asymptotically, $\mathsf{Dynaverse}$ outperforms the recursive-based approach by at least one order of magnitude.

The Fiat-Shamir transformation is a key technique for removing interactivity from cryptographic proof systems in real-world applications. In this work, we discuss five types of Fiat-Shamir-related protocol design errors and illustrate them with concrete examples mainly taken from real-life applications. We discuss countermeasures for such vulnerabilities.

Secure key leasing (a.k.a. key-revocable cryptography) enables us to lease a cryptographic key as a quantum state in such a way that the key can be later revoked in a verifiable manner. We propose a simple framework for constructing cryptographic primitives with secure key leasing via the certified deletion property of BB84 states. Based on our framework, we obtain the following schemes.

- A public key encryption scheme with secure key leasing that has classical revocation based on any IND-CPA secure public key encryption scheme. Prior works rely on either quantum revocation or stronger assumptions such as the quantum hardness of the learning with errors (LWE) problem.

- A pseudorandom function with secure key leasing that has classical revocation based on one-way functions. Prior works rely on stronger assumptions such as the quantum hardness of the LWE problem.

- A digital signature scheme with secure key leasing that has classical revocation based on the quantum hardness of the short integer solution (SIS) problem. Our construction has static signing keys, i.e., the state of a signing key almost does not change before and after signing. Prior constructions either rely on non-static signing keys or indistinguishability obfuscation to achieve a stronger goal of copy-protection.

In addition, all of our schemes remain secure even if a verification key for revocation is leaked after the adversary submits a valid certificate of deletion. To our knowledge, all prior constructions are totally broken in this setting. Moreover, in our view, our security proofs are much simpler than those for existing schemes.

SQIsign is a well-known post-quantum signature scheme due to its small combined signature and public-key size. However, SQIsign suffers from notably long signing times, and verification times are not short either. To improve this, recent research has explored both one-dimensional and two-dimensional variants of SQIsign, each with distinct characteristics. In particular, SQIsign2D’s efficient signing and verification times have made it a focal point of recent research. However, the absence of an optimized one-dimensional verification implementation hampers a thorough comparison between these different variants.

This work bridges this gap in the literature: we provide a state-of-the-art implementation of one-dimensional SQIsign verification, including novel optimizations. We report a record-breaking one-dimensional SQIsign verification time of 8.6 Ice Lake Mcycles, closely matching SQIsign2D. For uncompressed signatures, the signature size doubles and we verify in only 5.6 Mcycles. Taking advantage of the inherent parallelism available in isogeny computations, we present 5-core variants that can go as low as 1.3 Mcycles. Furthermore, we present the first implementation that supports both 32-bit and 64-bit processors. It includes optimized assembly code for the Cortex-M4 and has been integrated with the pqm4 project. Our results motivate further research into one-dimensional SQIsign, as it boasts unique features among isogeny-based schemes.

Peer-to-peer energy trading markets enable users to exchange electricity, directly offering them increased financial benefits. However, discrepancies often arise between the electricity volumes committed to in trading auctions and the volumes actually consumed or injected. Solutions designed to address this issue often require access to sensitive information that should be kept private.

This paper presents a novel, fully privacy-preserving billing protocol designed to protect users' sensitive consumption and production data in the context of billing protocols for energy trading. Leveraging advanced cryptographic techniques, including fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) and pseudorandom zero sharing (PRZS), our protocol ensures robust security and confidentiality while addressing the critical issue of managing discrepancies between promised and actual electricity volumes. The proposed protocol guarantees that users' sensitive information remains inaccessible to external parties, including the trading platform and billing server. By utilizing FHE, the protocol allows computations on encrypted data without compromising privacy, while PRZS ensures secure aggregation of individual discrepancies of each household. This combination of cryptographic primitives maintains data privacy and enhances billing accuracy, even when fluctuations in energy supply and demand occur.

We analyze real-time consumption and production data from 100 households to experimentally validate the effectiveness and efficiency of our billing model. By implementing a flexible framework compatible with any billing method, we demonstrate that our protocol can accurately compute individual bills for 100 households in approximately 0.17 seconds.

In modern business to customer interactions, handling private or confidential data is essential. Private Function Evaluation (PFE) protocols ensure the privacy of both the customers' input data and the business' function evaluated on it which is often sensitive intellectual property (IP). However, fully hiding the function in PFE results in high performance overhead. Semi-Private Function Evaluation (SPFE) is a generalization of PFE to only partially hide the function, whereas specific non-critical components remain public. Our paper introduces a novel framework designed to make SPFE accessible to non-experts and practical for real-world deployments.

To achieve this, we improve on previous SPFE solutions in two aspects. First, we enhance the developer experience by leveraging High-Level Synthesis (HLS), making our tool more user-friendly than previous SPFE frameworks. Second, we achieve a \(2 \times\) speedup compared to the previous state-of-the-art through more efficient underlying constructions and the usage of Lookup Tables (LUTs).

We evaluate the performance of our framework in terms of communication and runtime efficiency. Our final implementation is available as an open-source project, aiming to bridge the gap between advanced cryptographic protocols and their practical application in industry scenarios.

A Private Set Union (PSU) allows two parties having sets $X$ and $Y$ to securely compute the union $X \cup Y$ while revealing no additional information. Recently, there have been proposed so-called shuffle-based PSU protocols due to Garimella et. al. (PKC'21) and Jia et. al. (USENIX'22). Except a few base oblivious transfers, those proposals are fully based on symmetric key primitives and hence enjoy quite low computation costs. However, they commonly have drawbacks on large communication cost of $O(\ell n\log n)$ with input set size $n$ and $\ell \ge O(\lambda + \log n)$ where $\lambda$ is a statistical security parameter.

We propose two optimizations for each work that reduce communication cost while maintaining strength in computation cost; the first one optimizes Garimella et. al. to have $O(\ell n + n \log n)$, and the second one optimizes Jia et. al. by reducing the concrete value of $\ell$ by $\log n$. Concretely, the first (second, resp) optimization provides $3.3 - 3.9$x ($1.7 - 1.8$x, resp) lower communication input set sizes $n = 2^{16} - 2^{20}$.

We demonstrate by comprehensive analysis and implementation that our optimization leads to better PSU protocol, compared to the state-of-the-art proposal of Zhang et. al. (USENIX'23) as well as previous shuffle-based PSUs. As a concrete amount of improvement, we see $1.4-1.5$x speed up for $100$Mbps network, and $1.8-2.2$x speed up for $10$Mbps network on input set sizes $n = 2^{16} - 2^{20}$.

This paper reveals a critical flaw in the design of ARADI, a recently proposed low-latency block cipher by NSA researchers -- Patricia Greene, Mark Motley, and Bryan Weeks. The weakness exploits the specific composition of Toffoli gates in the round function of ARADI's nonlinear layer, and it allows the extension of a given algebraic distinguisher to one extra round without any change in the data complexity. More precisely, we show that the cube-sum values, though depending on the secret key bits, are always equal in two of the state words. Such a structural property is difficult to obtain by the direct application of division property and has never been seen before in any state-of-the-art block cipher. We call this structural property \textit{weakly-composed-Toffoli gates}, and introduce a theoretical framework which can describe it in general terms. We present algebraic distinguishers that reach 8 out of 16 rounds of ARADI. Most notably, we show that these distinguishers have better data complexities than the division property-based distinguishers for the same number of rounds. We further investigate whether changing the linear layer or the order of composition of Toffoli gates could avoid this property. We give a negative answer to the same and show that it is impossible to prevent this structural property unless the nonlinear layer is re-designed. As a side result, we provide a key-recovery attack on 10 rounds ARADI with $2^{124}$ data and $2^{177}$ time for a 256-bit key. Our work highlights the significance of security analysis during the cipher design phase, and shows that these strong structural distinguishers could have been avoided during this phase.

Searchable encryption, or more generally, structured encryption, permits search over encrypted data. It is an important cryptographic tool for securing cloud storage. The standard security notion for structured encryption mandates that a protocol leaks nothing about the data or queries, except for some allowed leakage, defined by the leakage function. This is due to the fact that some leakage is unavoidable for efficient schemes. Unfortunately, it was shown by numerous works that even innocuous-looking leakage can often be exploited by attackers to undermine users' privacy and recover their queries and/or data, despite the structured encryption schemes being provably secure. Nevertheless, the standard security remains the go-to notion used to show the "security" of structured encryption schemes. While it is not likely that researchers will design practical structured encryption schemes with no leakage, it is not satisfactory that very few works study ways to assess leakage. This work proposes a novel framework to quantify leakage. Our methodology is inspired by the quantitative information flow, and we call our method $q$-leakage analysis. We show how $q$-leakage analysis is related to the standard security. We also demonstrate the usefulness of $q$-leakage analysis by analyzing the security of two existing schemes with complex leakage functions.

Threshold signatures have been drawing lots of attention in recent years. Of particular interest are threshold signatures that are proven secure under adaptive corruptions (NIST Call 2023). Sadly, existing constructions with provable adaptive security suffer from at least one of the following drawbacks: (i) strong idealizations such as the algebraic group model (AGM), (ii) an unnatural restriction on the corruption threshold being $t/2$ where $t$ is the signing threshold, or (iii) prohibitively large security loss under established assumptions. Notably, point (iii) has received little to no attention in the literature on this subject.

In this work, we introduce Twinkle-T, a new threshold signature scheme which overcomes these limitations. Twinkle-T is the first scheme to have a fully tight security proof under up to $t$ adaptive corruptions without relying on the AGM. It also has a signing protocol consisting of only three rounds and thus matches the currently best threshold signature with full adaptive security Twinkle (Eurocrypt 2024) in the pairing-free discrete logarithm setting. We prove security from a standard non-interactive assumption, namely, the Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption.

We extend the usual ideal action on oriented elliptic curves to a (Hermitian) module action on oriented (polarised) abelian varieties. Oriented abelian varieties are naturally enriched in $R$-modules, and our module action comes from the canonical power object construction on categories enriched in a closed symmetric monoidal category. In particular our action is canonical and gives a fully fledged symmetric monoidal action. Furthermore, we give algorithms to compute this action in practice, generalising the usual algorithms in rank~$1$.

The action allows us to unify in the same framework, on the one hand isogeny based cryptography based on ordinary or oriented elliptic curves, and on the other hand the one based on supersingular elliptic curves defined over $\mathbb{F}_{p^2}$. In particular, from our point of view, supersingular elliptic curves over $\mathbb{F}_p$ are given by a rank~$1$ module action, while (the Weil restriction) of those defined over $\mathbb{F}_{p^2}$ are given by a rank~$2$ module action. As a consequence, rank~$2$ module action inversion is at least as hard as the supersingular isogeny path problem.

We thus propose to use Hermitian modules as an avatar of a cryptographic symmetric monoidal action framework. This generalizes the more standard cryptographic group action framework, and still allows for a NIKE (Non Interactive Key Exchange). The main advantage of our action is that, presumably, Kuperberg's algorithm does not apply. Compared to CSIDH, this allows for more compact keys and much better scaling properties.

In practice, we propose the key exchange scheme $\otimes$-MIKE (Tensor Module Isogeny Key Exchange). Alice and Bob start from a supersingular elliptic curve $E_0/\mathbb{F}_p$ and both compute a $2^n$-isogeny over $\mathbb{F}_{p^2}$. They each send the $j$-invariant of their curve. Crucially, unlike SIDH, no torsion information at all is required. Their common secret, given by the module action, is then a dimension~$4$ principally polarised abelian variety. We obtain a very compact post-quantum NIKE: only 64B for NIST level~$1$ security.

Laconic cryptography studies two-message protocols that securely compute on large amounts of data with minimal communication cost. Laconic oblivious transfer (OT) is a central primitive where the receiver's input is a large database $\mathsf{DB}$ and the sender's inputs are two messages $m_0$, $m_1$ along with an index $i$, such that the receiver learns the message determined by the choice bit $\mathsf{DB}_i$. OT becomes even more useful for secure computation when considering its laconic variants, which offer succinctness and round optimality. However, existing constructions are not practically efficient because they rely on heavy cryptographic machinery and non-black-box techniques.

In this work, we initiate the study of laconic OT correlations, where the model allows an offline phase to generate the correlations later used in a lightweight online phase. Our correlation is conceptually simple, captured by an inner product computation, and enables us to achieve a private laconic OT protocol where the sender's index $i$ is also hidden from the receiver. Our construction is the first private laconic OT with database-dependent preprocessing based solely on symmetric-key assumptions, achieving sublinear online computational complexity for the receiver. Furthermore, we enhance our construction with updatability and receiver privacy. Finally, we demonstrate the applications of private laconic OT to laconic function evaluation for RAM programs and laconic private set intersection with preprocessing.

Tweakable enciphering modes (TEMs) provide security in a variety of storage and space-critical applications like disk and file-based encryption, and packet-based communication protocols, among others. XCB-AES (known as XCBv2) is specified in the IEEE 1619.2 standard for encryption of sector-oriented storage media and it comes with a proof of security for block-aligned input messages.

In this work, we demonstrate an attack on XCBv2. We show that XCBv2 is $\textit{insecure}$ also for full block messages by presenting a plaintext recovery attack using $\textit{only}$ two queries. We demonstrate that our attack further applies to the HCI and MXCB TEMs, which follow a similar design approach to XCBv2. We then propose a simple, ``quick'' fix that is not vulnerable to our attack and provably restore the security for XCBv2. Following the responsible disclosure process, we communicated the attack details to IEEE and the authors of XCB-AES. The authors have confirmed the validity of our attack on 02/09/2024.

Our next contribution is to strengthen the provable security of XCBv2 (currently $n/3$ bits). We propose a new modular TEM called GEM which can be seen as a generalization of the Hash-CTR-Hash approach as used in XCB-style and HCTR-style TEMs. We are able to prove that GEM achieves full $n$-bit security using $\textit{only}$ $n$-bit PRP/PRF. We also give two concrete GEM instantiations: $\mathsf{KohiNoor}$ and $\mathsf{DaryaiNoor}$, both of which are based on AES-128 and GHASH-256, and internally use variants of the CTR-based weak pseudorandom functions GCTR-3 and SoCTR, respectively. SoCTR uses AES-128 and GCTR-3 is based on $\mathsf{ButterKnife}$-256. Our security proofs show that both $\mathsf{KohiNoor}$ and $\mathsf{DaryaiNoor}$ provide full $n$-bit security. From applications perspective, $\mathsf{DaryaiNoor}$ addresses the need for reusing classical components, while $\mathsf{KohiNoor}$ enhances performance by leveraging a more modern primitive based on the AES/Deoxys round function. Our implementation demonstrates competitive performance: For typical 4KiB sector size, $\mathsf{KohiNoor}$'s performance is on par with AES$_{6}$-CTET+, yet achieving higher standard security guarantees. $\mathsf{DaryaiNoor}$ is on par with AES-CTET+ performance-wise while also maintaining higher security with standard components. Our GEM instances triple the security margin of XCBv2 and double that of HCTR2 at the cost of performance loss of only $12\%$ ($\mathsf{KohiNoor}$) and $68\%$ ($\mathsf{DaryaiNoor}$) for 4KiB messages.

This work describes a digital signature scheme constructed from a zero-knowledge proof of knowledge of a pre-image of the Rescue Prime Optimized (RPO) permutation. The proof of knowledge is constructed with the DEEP-ALI interactive oracle proof combined with the Ben-Sasson--Chiesa--Spooner (BCS) transformation in the random oracle model. The EUF-CMA security of the resulting signature scheme is established from the UC-friendly security properties of the BCS transformation and the pre-image hardness of the RPO permutation.

The implementation of the scheme computes signatures in 13 ms and verifies them in 1 ms on a single core when the BCS transform is implemented with the Blake3 hash function. (The multi-threaded implementation signs in 9.2 ms and also verifies in 1 ms.) These speeds are obtained with parameters achieving 122 bits of average-case security for \( 2^{122} \)-bounded adversaries with access to at most \( 2^{64} \) signatures.

Keyed-verification anonymous credentials are widely recognized as among the most efficient tools for anonymous authentication. In this work, we revisit two prominent credential systems: the scheme by Chase et al. (CCS 2014), commonly referred to as CMZ or PS MAC, and the scheme by Barki et al. (SAC 2016), known as BBDT or BBS MAC. We show how to make CMZ statistically anonymous and BBDT compatible with the BBS RFC draft. We provide a comprehensive security analysis for strong(er) properties of unforgeability and anonymity. These properties allow them to be composed with extensions that users can pick and choose. We show that simpler variants satisfying one-more unforgeability can still be anonymous tokens (Kreuter et al., CRYPTO 2020).

To enable faster proofs for complex presentations, we present a compiler that uses an interactive oracle proof and a designated-verifier polynomial commitment to construct a designated-verifier non-interactive argument. For keyed-verification anonymous credentials, designated-verifier proofs suffice since the verifier is known in advance. We explore extensions that could benefit from this approach.

Cryptographic proof systems have a plethora of applications: from building other cryptographic tools (e.g., malicious security for MPC protocols) to concrete settings such as private transactions or rollups. In several settings it is important for proof systems to be non-malleable: an adversary should not to be able to modify a proof they have observed into another for a statement for which they do not know the witness. Proof systems that have been deployed in practice should arguably satisfy this notion: it is crucial in settings such as transaction systems and in order to securely compose proofs with other cryptographic protocols. As a consequence, results on non-malleability should keep up with designs of proofs being deployed. Recently, Arun et al. proposed $\mathsf{Jolt}$ (Eurocrypt 2024), arguably the first efficient proof system whose architecture is based on the lookup singularity approach (Barry Whitehat, 2022). This approach consists in representing a general computation as a series of table lookups. The final result is a SNARK for a Virtual Machine execution (or SNARK VM). Both SNARK VMs and lookup-singularity SNARKs are architectures with enormous potential and will probably be adopted more and more in the next years (and they already are). As of today, however, there is no literature regarding the non-malleability of SNARK VMs. The goal of this work is to fill this gap by providing both concrete non-malleability results and a set of technical tools for a more general study of SNARK VMs security (as well as "modular" SNARKs in general). As a concrete result, we study the non-malleability of (an idealized version of) $\mathsf{Jolt}$ and its fundamental building block, the lookup argument $\mathsf{Lasso}$. While connecting our new result on the non-malleability of $\mathsf{Lasso}$ to that of $\mathsf{Jolt}$, we develop a set of tools that enable the composition of non-malleable SNARKs. We believe this toolbox to be valuable in its own right.

As the industry prepares for the transition to post-quantum secure public key cryptographic algorithms, vulnerability analysis of their implementations is gaining importance. A theoretically secure cryptographic algorithm should also be able to withstand the challenges of physical attacks in real-world environments. MAYO is a candidate in the ongoing first round of the NIST post-quantum standardization process for selecting additional digital signature schemes. This paper demonstrates three first-order single-execution fault injection attacks on a MAYO implementation in an ARM Cortex-M4 processor. By using voltage glitching to disrupt the computation of the vinegar seed during the signature generation, we enable the recovery of the secret key directly from the faulty signatures. Our experimental results show that the success rates of the fault attacks in a single execution are 36%, 82%, and 99%, respectively. They emphasize the importance of developing countermeasures against fault attacks prior to the widespread deployment of post-quantum algorithms like MAYO.

Non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proofs allow a prover to convince a verifier about the validity of an NP-statement by sending a single message and without disclosing any additional information (besides the validity of the statement). Single-message cryptographic proofs are very versatile, which has made them widely used both in theory and in practice. This is particularly true for succinct proofs, where the length of the message is sublinear in the size of the NP relation. This versatility, unfortunately, comes at a price, since any NIZK proof system requires some form of setup, like a common reference string. One way to circumvent the need for a setup is by relying on a Random Oracle. Unfortunately, if the Random Oracle is modeled as a Global resource that the simulator is not allowed to program, then it is impossible to obtain a secure NIZK. This impossibility has been circumvented by allowing the simulator (and the real-world adversary) to program the RO, and allowing the honest parties to check, via a special interface, if the RO outputs have been programmed. In this work, we show that this impossibility can be circumvented by meaningfully weakening the Universal Composability framework following the model proposed by Broadnax et al. (Eurocrypt 2017). In this model, the ideal world functionalities are allowed to interact with oracles that have quasi-polynomial time capabilities. As our main result, we propose the first composable NIZK proof system that relies on a global (non-programmable) random oracle as its only form of setup. The NIZK scheme we propose is witness-succinct (with proofs logarithmic in the size of the witness). Our results break both the barrier of programmability of the random oracle and of polylogarithmic proof size for UC-secure NIZKs with transparent setups. We are able to construct our NIZK using the framework proposed by Ganesh et al. (Eurocrypt 2023), which requires—among other building blocks—a polynomial commitment scheme with special features and a polynomial encoding scheme (a primitive that appropriately masks a witness as a polynomial). As a core technical contribution, we show a polynomial commitment of this type using a basic component of Bulletproofs as a building block, as well as a polynomial encoding based on techniques completely different from the ones from Ganesh et al..