International Association
for Cryptologic Research

Secure aggregation is the distributed task of securely computing a sum of values (or a vector of values) held by a set of parties, revealing only the output (i.e., the sum) in the computation. Existing protocols, such as Prio (NDSI’17), Prio+ (SCN’22), Elsa (S&P’23), and Whisper (S&P’24), support secure aggregation with input validation to ensure inputs belong to a specified domain. However, when malicious servers are present, these protocols primarily guarantee privacy but not input validity. Also, malicious server(s) can cause the protocol to abort. We introduce SCIF, a novel multi-server secure aggregation protocol with input validation, that remains secure even in the presence of malicious actors, provided fewer than one-third of the servers are malicious. Our protocol overcomes previous limitations by providing two key properties: (1) guaranteed output delivery, ensuring malicious parties cannot prevent the protocol from completing, and (2) guaranteed input inclusion, ensuring no malicious party can prevent an honest party’s input from being included in the computation. Together, these guarantees provide strong resilience against denial-of-service attacks. Moreover, SCIF offers these guarantees without increasing client costs over Prio and keeps server costs moderate. We present a robust end-to-end implementation of SCIF and demonstrate the ease with which it can be instrumented by integrating it in a simulated Tor network for privacy-preserving measurement.

We put forth Oblivious State Preparation (OSP) as a cryptographic primitive that unifies techniques developed in the context of a quantum server interacting with a classical client. OSP allows a classical polynomial-time sender to input a choice of one out of two public observables, and a quantum polynomial-time receiver to recover an eigenstate of the corresponding observable -- while keeping the sender's choice hidden from any malicious receiver.

We obtain the following results: - The existence of (plain) trapdoor claw-free functions implies OSP, and the existence of dual-mode trapdoor claw-free functions implies round-optimal (two-round) OSP. - OSP implies the existence of proofs of quantumness, test of a qubit, blind classical delegation of quantum computation, and classical verification of quantum computation. - Two-round OSP implies quantum money with classical communication, classically-verifiable position verification, and (additionally assuming classical FHE with log-depth decryption) quantum FHE.

Thus, the OSP abstraction helps separate the cryptographic layer from the information-theoretic layer when building cryptosystems across classical and quantum participants. Indeed, several of the aforementioned applications were previously only known via tailored LWE-based constructions, whereas our OSP-based constructions yield new results from a wider variety of assumptions, including hard problems on cryptographic group actions.

Finally, towards understanding the minimal hardness assumptions required to realize OSP, we prove the following:

- OSP implies oblivious transfer between one classical and one quantum party. - Two-round OSP implies public-key encryption with classical keys and ciphertexts.

In particular, these results help to ''explain'' the use of public-key cryptography in the known approaches to establishing a ''classical leash'' on a quantum server. For example, combined with a result of Austrin et al. (CRYPTO 22), we conclude that perfectly-correct OSP cannot exist unconditionally in the (quantum) random oracle model.

As cryptographic protocols continue to become more complex and specialized, their security proofs have grown more complex as well, making manual verification of their correctness more difficult. Formal verification via proof assistants has become a popular approach to solving this, by allowing researchers to write security proofs that can be verified correct by a computer.

In this paper we present a new framework of this kind for verifying security proofs, taking a foundational approach to representing and reasoning about protocols. We implement our framework in the Lean programming language, and give a number of security proofs to demonstrate that our system is both powerful and usable, with comparable automation to similar systems.

Our framework is especially focused on reasoning about and manipulating oracle access, and we demonstrate the usefulness of this approach by implementing both a general forking lemma and a version of the Fiat-Shamir transform for sigma protocols. As a simple case study we then instantiate these to an implementation of a Schnorr-like signature scheme.

Multivariate cryptography currently centres mostly around UOV-based signature schemes: All multivariate round 2 candidates in the selection process for additional digital signatures by NIST are either UOV itself or close variations of it: MAYO, QR-UOV, SNOVA, and UOV. Also schemes which have been in the focus of the multivariate research community, but are broken by now - like Rainbow and LUOV - are based on UOV. Both UOV and the schemes based on it have been frequently analyzed regarding their physical security in the course of the NIST process. However, a comprehensive analysis regarding the physical security of UOV-based signature schemes is missing. In this work, we want to bridge this gap and create a comprehensive overview of physical attacks on UOV and its variants from the second round of NIST’s selection process for additional post-quantum signature schemes, which just started. First, we collect all existing side-channel and fault attacks on UOV-based schemes and transfer them to the current UOV specification. Since UOV was subject to significant changes over the past few years, e.g., adaptions to the expanded secret key, some attacks need to be reassessed. Next, we introduce new physical attacks in order to obtain an overview as complete as possible. We then show how all these attacks would translate to MAYO, QR-UOV, and SNOVA. To improve the resistance of UOV-based signature schemes towards physical attacks, we discuss and introduce dedicated countermeasures. As related result, we observe that certain implementation decisions, like key compression techniques and randomization choices, also have a large impact on the physical security, in particular on the effectiveness of the considered fault attacks. Finally, we provide implementations of UOV and MAYO for the ARM Cortex-M4 architecture that feature first-order masking and protection against selected fault attacks. We benchmark the resulting overhead on a NUCLEO-L4R5ZI board and validate our approach by performing a TVLA on original and protected subroutines, yielding significantly smaller t-values for the latter.

We present the protected hardware implementation of the Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard (MLDSA). ML-DSA is an extension of Dilithium 3.1, which is the winner of the Post Quantum Cryptography (PQC) competition in the digital signature category. The proposed design is based on the existing high-performance Dilithium 3.1 design. We implemented existing Dilithium masking gadgets in hardware, which were only implemented in software. The masking gadgets are integrated with the unprotected ML-DSA design and functional verification of the complete design is verified with the Known Answer Tests(KATs) generated from an updated ML-DSA software implementation. We also present the practical power side-channel attack experimental results by implementing masking gadgets on the standard sidechannel evaluation FPGA board and collecting power traces up-to 1 million traces. The proposed protected design has the overhead of 1.127× LUT, 1.2× Flip-Flop, and 378× execution time compared to unprotected design. The experimental results show that it resists side-channel attacks.

Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) systems are ubiqui- tous in modern day automobiles, providing convenience for vehicle owners - occasionally at the cost of security. Most automobile companies have proprietary implementations of RKE; these are sometimes built on insecure algorithms and authentication mechanisms. This paper presents a compre- hensive study conducted on the RKE systems of multiple cars from four automobile manufacturers not previously explored. Specifically, we analyze the design, implementation, and security levels of 7 different cars manufactured by Honda, Maruti-Suzuki, Toyota, and Mahindra. We also do a deep dive into the RKE system of a particular Honda model. We evaluate the susceptibility of these systems to known vulnerabilities (such as RollJam and RollBack at- tacks). This is accomplished using a novel tool – ‘Puck- py’, that helps analyze RKE protocols. Our tool automates several aspects of the protocol analysis process, reducing time and logistical constraints in RKE research; we provide standardized protocols to execute various attacks using our Puck-Py tool. We find that, despite having a long period of time to fix security issues, several popular automobiles remain susceptible to attacks, including the basic RollJam attack.

Succinct randomized encodings allow encoding the input $x$ of a time-$t$ uniform computation $M(x)$ in sub-linear time $o(t)$. The resulting encoding $\tilde{x}$ allows recovering the result of the computation $M(x)$, but hides any other information about $x$. Such encodings are known to have powerful applications such as reducing communication in MPC, bootstrapping advanced encryption schemes, and constructing time-lock puzzles.

Until not long ago, the only known constructions were based on indistinguishability obfuscation, and in particular they were not based on standard post-quantum assumptions. In terms of efficiency, these constructions' encoding time is $\rm{polylog}(t)$, essentially the best one can hope for. Recently, a new construction was presented based on Circular Learning with Errors, an assumption similar to the one used in fully-homomorphic encryption schemes, and which is widely considered to be post-quantum resistant. However, the encoding efficiency significantly falls behind obfuscation-based scheme and is $\approx \sqrt{t} \cdot s$, where $s$ is the space of the computation.

We construct, under the same assumption, succinct randomized encodings with encoding time $\approx t^{\varepsilon} \cdot s$ for arbitrarily small constant $\varepsilon<1$. Our construction is relatively simple, generic and relies on any non-compact single-key functional encryption that satisfies a natural {\em efficiency preservation} property.

Privacy-preserving blockchains and private messaging services that ensure receiver-privacy face a significant UX challenge: each client must scan every payload posted on the public bulletin board individually to avoid missing messages intended for them. Oblivious Message Retrieval (OMR) addresses this issue by securely outsourcing this expensive scanning process to a service provider using Homomorphic Encryption (HE).

In this work, we propose a new OMR scheme that substantially improves upon the previous state-of-the-art, PerfOMR (USENIX Security'24). Our implementation demonstrates reductions of 3.3x in runtime, 2.2x in digest size, and 1.3x in key size, in a scenario with 65536 payloads (each 612 bytes), of which up to 50 are pertinent.

At the core of these improvements is a new homomorphic compression mechanism, where ciphertexts of length proportional to the number of total payloads are compressed into a digest whose length is proportional to the upper bound on the number of pertinent payloads. Unlike previous approaches, our scheme fully exploits the native homomorphic SIMD structure of the underlying HE scheme, significantly enhancing efficiency. In the setting described above, our compression scheme achieves 7.4x speedup compared to PerfOMR.

Pseudo-Random Injections (PRIs) have had several applications in symmetric-key cryptography, such as in the idealization of Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD) schemes, building robust AEAD, and, recently, in converting a committing AEAD scheme into a succinctly committing AEAD scheme. In Crypto 2024, Bellare and Hoang showed that if an AEAD scheme is already committing, it can be transformed into a succinctly committed scheme by encrypting part of the plaintext using a PRI. In this paper, we revisit the applications of PRIs in building Message Authentication Codes (MACs) and AEAD schemes.

First, we look at some of the properties and definitions PRIs, such as collision resistance and unforgeability when used as a MAC with small plaintext space, under different leakage models. Next, we show how they can be combined with collision-resistant hash functions to build a MAC for long plaintexts, offering flexible security depending on how the PRI and equality check are implemented. If both the PRI and equality check are leak-free, the MAC provides almost optimal security, but the security only degrades a little if the equality check is only leakage-resilient (rather than leak-free). If the equality check has unbounded leakage, the security drops to a baseline security, rather than being completely insecure. Next, we show how to use PRIs to build a succinctly committing online AEAD scheme dubbed as scoAE from scratch that achieves succinct CMT4 security, privacy, and Ciphertext Integrity with Misuse and Leakage (CIML2) security. Last but not least, we show how to build a succinct nonce Misuse-Resistant (MRAE) AEAD scheme, dubbed as scMRAE. The construction combines the SIV paradigm with PRI-based encryption (e.g. the Encode-then-Encipher (EtE) framework).

A succinct non-interactive argument (SNARG) for NP allows a prover to convince a verifier that an NP statement $x$ is true with a proof whose size is sublinear in the length of the traditional NP witness. Moreover, a SNARG is adaptively sound if the adversary can choose the statement it wants to prove after seeing the scheme parameters. Very recently, Waters and Wu (STOC 2024) showed how to construct adaptively-sound SNARGs for NP in the plain model from falsifiable assumptions (specifically, sub-exponentially-secure indistinguishability obfuscation, sub-exponentially-secure one-way functions, and polynomial hardness of discrete log).

We consider the batch setting where the prover wants to prove a collection of $T$ statements $x_1, \ldots, x_T$ and its goal is to construct a proof whose size is sublinear in both the size of a single witness and the number of instances $T$. In this setting, existing constructions either require the size of the public parameters to scale linearly with $T$ (and thus, can only support an a priori bounded number of instances), or only provide non-adaptive soundness, or have proof size that scales linearly with the size of a single NP witness. In this work, we give two approaches for batching adaptively-sound SNARGs for NP, and in particular, show that under the same set of assumptions as those underlying the Waters-Wu adaptively-sound SNARG, we can obtain an adaptively-sound SNARG for batch NP where the size of the proof is $\mathsf{poly}(\lambda)$ and the size of the CRS is $\mathsf{poly}(\lambda + |C|)$, where $\lambda$ is a security parameter and $|C|$ is the size of the circuit that computes the associated NP relation.

Our first approach builds directly on top of the Waters-Wu construction and relies on indistinguishability obfuscation and a homomorphic re-randomizable one-way function. Our second approach shows how to combine ideas from the Waters-Wu SNARG with the chaining-based approach by Garg, Sheridan, Waters, and Wu (TCC 2022) to obtain a SNARG for batch NP.

Recent active studies have demonstrated that cryptography without one-way functions (OWFs) could be possible in the quantum world. Many fundamental primitives that are natural quantum analogs of OWFs or pseudorandom generators (PRGs) have been introduced, and their mutual relations and applications have been studied. Among them, pseudorandom function-like state generators (PRFSGs) [Ananth, Qian, and Yuen, Crypto 2022] are one of the most important primitives. PRFSGs are a natural quantum analogue of pseudorandom functions (PRFs), and imply many applications such as IND-CPA secret-key encryption (SKE) and EUF-CMA message authentication code (MAC). However, only known constructions of (many-query-secure) PRFSGs are ones from OWFs or pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs). In this paper, we construct classically-accessible adaptive secure PRFSGs in the invertible quantum Haar random oracle (QHRO) model which is introduced in [Chen and Movassagh, Quantum]. The invertible QHRO model is an idealized model where any party can access a public single Haar random unitary and its inverse, which can be considered as a quantum analog of the random oracle model. Our PRFSG constructions resemble the classical Even-Mansour encryption based on a single permutation, and are secure against any unbounded polynomial number of queries to the oracle and construction. To our knowledge, this is the first application in the invertible QHRO model without any assumption or conjecture. The previous best construction in the idealized model is PRFSGs secure up to o(λ/ log λ) queries in the common Haar state model [Ananth, Gulati, and Lin, TCC 2024]. We develop new techniques on Haar random unitaries to prove the selective and adaptive security of our PRFSGs. For selective security, we introduce a new formula, which we call the Haar twirl approximation formula. For adaptive security, we show the unitary reprogramming lemma and the unitary resampling lemma. These have their own interest, and may have many further applications. In particular, by using the approximation formula, we give an alternative proof of the non-adaptive security of the PFC ensemble [Metger, Poremba, Sinha, and Yuen, FOCS 2024] as an additional result. Finally, we prove that our construction is not PRUs or quantum-accessible non-adaptive PRFSGs by presenting quantum polynomial time attacks. Our attack is based on generalizing the hidden subgroup problem where the relevant function outputs quantum states.

We establish a linear proximity gap for Reed-Solomon (RS) codes within the one-and-a-half Johnson bound. Specifically, we investigate the proximity gap for RS codes, revealing that any affine subspace is either entirely $\delta$-close to an RS code or nearly all its members are $\delta$-far from it. When $\delta$ is within the one-and-a-half Johnson bound, we prove an upper bound on the number of members (in the affine subspace) that are $\delta$-close to the RS code for the latter case. Our bound is linear in the length of codewords. In comparison, Ben-Sasson, Carmon, Ishai, Kopparty and Saraf [FOCS 2020] prove a linear bound when $\delta$ is within the unique decoding bound and a quadratic bound when $\delta$ is within the Johnson bound. Note that when the rate of the RS code is smaller than 0.23, the one-and-a-half Johnson bound is larger than the unique decoding bound.

Proximity gaps for Reed-Solomon (RS) codes have implications in various RS code-based protocols. In many cases, a stronger property than individual distance—known as correlated agreement—is required, i.e., functions in the affine subspace are not only $\delta$-close to an RS code, but also agree on the same evaluation domain. Our results support this stronger property.

Adaptor signatures extend the functionality of regular signatures through the computation of pre-signatures on messages for statements of NP relations. Pre-signatures are publicly verifiable; they simultaneously hide and commit to a signature of an underlying signature scheme on that message. Anybody possessing a corresponding witness for the statement can adapt the pre-signature to obtain the "regular" signature. Adaptor signatures have found numerous applications for conditional payments in blockchain systems, like payment channels (CCS'20, CCS'21), private coin mixing (CCS'22, SP'23), and oracle-based payments (NDSS'23).

In our work, we revisit the state of the security of adaptor signatures and their constructions. In particular, our two main contributions are:

- Security Gaps and Definitions: We review the widely-used security model of adaptor signatures due to Aumayr et al. (ASIACRYPT'21) and identify gaps in their definitions that render known protocols for private coin-mixing and oracle-based payments insecure. We give simple counterexamples of adaptor signatures that are secure w.r.t. their definitions but result in insecure instantiations of these protocols. To fill these gaps, we identify a minimal set of modular definitions that align with these practical applications. - Secure Constructions: Despite their popularity, all known constructions are (1) derived from identification schemes via the Fiat-Shamir transform in the random oracle model or (2) require modifications to the underlying signature verification algorithm, thus making the construction useless in the setting of cryptocurrencies. More concerningly, all known constructions were proven secure w.r.t. the insufficient definitions of Aumayr et al., leaving us with no provably secure adaptor signature scheme to use in applications. Firstly, in this work, we salvage all current applications by proving the security of the widely-used Schnorr adaptor signatures under our proposed definitions. We then provide several new constructions, including presenting the first adaptor signature schemes for Camenisch-Lysyanskaya (CL), Boneh-Boyen-Shacham (BBS+), and Waters signatures, all of which are proven secure in the standard model. Our new constructions rely on a new abstraction of digital signatures, called dichotomic signatures, which covers the essential properties we need to build adaptor signatures. Proving the security of all constructions (including identification-based schemes) relies on a novel non-black-box proof technique. Both our digital signature abstraction and the proof technique could be of independent interest to the community.

We provide several attacks on the BASS signature scheme introduced by Grigoriev, Ilmer, Ovchinnikov and Shpilrain in 2023. We lay out a trivial forgery attack which generates signatures passing the scheme's probabilistic signature verification with high probability. Generating these forgeries is faster than generating signatures honestly. Moreover, we describe a key-only attack which allows us to recover an equivalent private key from a signer's public key. The time complexity of this recovery is asymptotically the same as that of signing messages.

Many foundational results in the literature of consensus follow the Dolev-Yao model (FOCS '81), which treats digital signatures as ideal objects with perfect correctness and unforgeability. However, no work has yet formalized an ideal signature scheme that is both suitable for this methodology and possible to instantiate, or a composition theorem that ensures security when instantiating it cryptographically.

The Universal Composition (UC) framework would ensure composition if we could specify an ideal functionality for signatures and prove it UC-realizable. Unfortunately, all signature functionalities heretofore proposed are problematic when used to construct higher-level protocols: either the functionality internally computes a computationally secure signature, and therefore higher-level protocols must rely upon computational assumptions, or else the functionality introduces a new attack surface that does not exist when the functionality is realized. As a consequence, no consensus protocol has ever been analyzed in a modular way using existing ideal signature functionalities.

We propose a new unstoppable ideal functionality for signatures that is UC-realized exactly by the set of standard EUF-CMA signature schemes that are consistent and linear time. No adversary can prevent honest parties from obtaining perfectly ideal signature services from our functionality. We showcase its usefulness by presenting the first modular analysis of the Dolev-Strong broadcast protocol (SICOMP '83) in the UC framework. Our result can be interpreted as a step toward a sound realization of the Dolev-Yao methodology.

In this paper we introduce the notion of encrypted RAM delegation. In an encrypted RAM delegation scheme, the prover creates a succinct proof for a group of two input strings $x_\mathsf{pb}$ and $x_\mathsf{pr}$, where $x_\mathsf{pb}$ corresponds to a large \emph{public} input and $x_\mathsf{pr}$ is a \emph{private} input. A verifier can check correctness of computation of $\mathcal{M}$ on $(x_\mathsf{pb}, x_\mathsf{pr})$, given only the proof $\pi$ and $x_\mathsf{pb}$.

We design encrypted RAM delegation schemes from a variety of standard assumptions such as DDH, or LWE, or $k$-linear. We prove strong knowledge soundness guarantee for our scheme as well as a special input hiding property to ensure that $\pi$ does not leak anything about $x_\mathsf{pr}$.

We follow this by describing multiple applications of encrypted RAM delegation. First, we show how to design a rate-1 non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) argument system with a straight-line extractor. Despite over 30+ years of research, the only known construction in the literature for rate-1 NIZKs from standard assumptions relied on fully homomorphic encryption. Thus, we provide the first rate-1 NIZK scheme based purely on DDH or $k$-linear assumptions.

Next, we also design fully-homomorphic NIZKs from encrypted RAM delegation. The only prior solution crucially relied on algebraic properties of pairing-based NIZKs, thus was only known from the decision linear assumption. We provide the first fully-homomorphic NIZK system from LWE (thus post-quantum security) and from DDH-hard groups.

We also provide a communication-complexity-preserving compiler for a wide class of semi-malicious multiparty computation (MPC) protocols to obtain fully malicious MPC protocols. This gives the first such compiler for a wide class of MPC protocols as any comparable compiler provided in prior works relied on strong non-falsifiable assumptions such as zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (zkSNARKs). Moreover, we also show many other applications to composable zero-knowledge batch arguments, succinct delegation of committed programs, and fully context-hiding multi-key multi-hop homomorphic signatures.

Lattice problems have many applications in various domains of computer science. There is currently a gap in the understanding of these problems with respect to their worst-case complexity and their average-case behaviour. For instance, the Shortest Vector problem (SVP) on an n-dimensional lattice has worst-case complexity $2^{n+o(n)}$ \cite{ADRS15}. However, in practice, people rely on heuristic (unproven) sieving algorithms of time complexity $2^{0.292n+o(n)}$ \cite{BeckerDGL16} to assess the security of lattice-based cryptography schemes. Those heuristic algorithms are experimentally verified for lattices used in cryptography, which are usually random in some way.

In this paper, we try to bridge the gap between worst-case and heuristic algorithms. Using the formalism of random real lattices developped by Siegel, we show a tighter upper bound on an important lattice parameter called the smoothing parameter that applies to almost all random lattices. This allows us to obtain a $2^{n/2+o(n)}$ time algorithm for an approximation version of the SVP on random lattices with a small constant approximation factor.

The Feistel structure represents a fundamental architectural component within the domain of symmetric cryptographic algorithms, with a substantial body of research conducted within the context of classical computing environments. Nevertheless, research into specific symmetric cryptographic algorithms utilizing the Feistel structure is relatively scarce in quantum computing environments. This paper builds upon a novel 4-round distinguisher proposed by Ito et al. for the Feistel structure under the quantum chosen-ciphertext attack (qCCA) setting. It introduces a 5-round distinguisher for Camellia. The efficacy of the distinguisher has been empirically validated. Furthermore, this paper combines Grover's algorithm with Simon's algorithm, utilizing an analysis of Camellia's key scheduling characteristics to construct a 9-round key recovery attack on Camellia algorithm. The time complexity for acquiring the correct key bits is $2^{61.5}$, and it requires 531 quantum bits. This represents the inaugural chosen-ciphertext attack on Camellia under the Q2 model.

Zero-knowledge Succinct Non-interactive Argument of Knowledge (zkSNARK) is a powerful cryptographic primitive, in which a prover convinces a verifier that a given statement is true without leaking any additional information. However, existing zkSNARKs suffer from high computation overhead in the proof generation. This limits the applications of zkSNARKs, such as private payments, private smart contracts, and anonymous credentials. Private delegation has become a prominent way to accelerate proof generation. In this work, we propose Siniel, an efficient private delegation framework for zkSNARKs constructed from polynomial interactive oracle proof (PIOP) and polynomial commitment scheme (PCS). Our protocol allows a computationally limited prover (a.k.a. delegator) to delegate its expensive prover computation to several workers without leaking any information about the private witness. Most importantly, compared with the recent work EOS (USENIX’23), the state-of-the-art zkSNARK prover delegation framework, a prover in Siniel needs not to engage in the MPC protocol after sending its shares of private witness. This means that a Siniel prover can outsource the entire computation to the workers. We compare Siniel with EOS and show significant performance advantages of the former. The experimental results show that, under low bandwidth conditions (10MBps), Siniel saves about 65% time for delegators than that of EOS, whereas under high bandwidth conditions (1000MBps), Siniel saves about 95% than EOS.

We introduce a method for enforcing covenants on Bitcoin outputs without requiring any changes to Bitcoin by designing a hash collision based equivalence check which bridges Bitcoin's limited Big Script to Bitcoin's Small Script. This allows us evaluate the signature of the spending transaction (available only to Big Script) in Small Script. As Small Script enables arbitrary computations, we can introspect into the spending transaction and enforce covenants on it.

Our approach leverages finding collisions in the $160$-bit hash functions: SHA-1 and RIPEMD-160. By the birthday bound this should cost $\sim2^{80}$ work. Each spend of our covenant costs $\sim2^{86}$ hash queries and $\sim2^{56}$ bytes of space. For security, we rely on an assumption regarding the hardness of finding a $3$-way collision (with short inputs) in $160$-bit hash functions, arguing that if the assumption holds, breaking covenant enforcement requires $\sim2^{110}$ hash queries. To put this in perspective, the work to spend our covenant is $\sim33$ hours of the Bitcoin mining network, whereas breaking our covenant requires $\sim 450,000$ years of the Bitcoin mining network. We believe there are multiple directions of future work that can significantly improve these numbers.

Evaluating covenants and our equivalence check requires performing many operations in Small Script, which must take no more than $4$ megabytes in total size, as Bitcoin does not allow transactions greater than $4$ megabytes. We only provide rough estimates of the transaction size because, as of this writing, no Small Script implementations of the hash functions required, SHA-1 and RIPEMD-160, have been written.