International Association
for Cryptologic Research

The Learning with Errors (LWE) problem is a fundamental hardness assumption underlying most fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) schemes. Given the close relationship between the Learning with Rounding (LWR) and LWE problems, several cryptographic constructions have also been developed based on LWR. In particular, LWR-based schemes often benefit from simpler and more efficient implementations, as they eliminate the need for explicit Gaussian error sampling. Despite these advantages, relatively few FHE constructions in the literature are based on the LWR assumption.

At AsiaCCS 2025, Goyal and Gangopadhyay proposed a multi-key FHE (MKFHE) scheme based on LWR that adopts a public-key extension mechanism rather than the conventional ciphertext-extension paradigm. The authors also identified the development of a ring-based analogue as an open future direction.

In this work, we present two Ring-LWR-based MKFHE constructions that can be viewed as ring analogues of the LWR-based MKFHE scheme of Goyal and Gangopadhyay. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first MKFHE schemes based on the Ring-LWR assumption. Compared with existing Ring-LWE-based multi-key constructions, our schemes achieve improved compactness in terms of storage and communication costs. We provide concrete parameterizations supporting circuits of varying multiplicative depths and present a proof-of-concept implementation to validate our claims.

We show that the data deduplication scheme [IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput., 11(1), 156-167, 2023] is flawed due to some inconsistent computations. The scheme tries to propose a hybrid encryption and authentication mechanism based on RSA cryptosystem and pairing cryptosystem, but it has confused the different group operations. In the data sharing phase, the cloud service provider cannot determine which stored tag matches the temporary tag, and fails to return the stored data to the requester. To fix, it should explicitly specify which is randomized by modular exponentiation with an RSA modulus, and which is randomized by point multiplication over the underlying elliptic curve.

Pseudorandom codes (PRCs), introduced at Crypto 2024 by Christ and Gunn, are encryption schemes with pseudorandom ciphertexts and error-correction guarantees. PRCs are useful as a tool to obtain watermarking for generative models, in particular ensuring that a watermark is hard to remove against an attacker that can modify up to a given fraction of the watermarked output (a.k.a. the robustness property). A PRC is public-key if the encoding procedure is public (whereas detection requires the corresponding secret key).

In this paper, we provide the first construction of public-key PRCs for the binary alphabet satisfying robustness in the presence of a constant fraction of substitutions ($1/6 - \varepsilon$, for arbitrary $\varepsilon > 0$) and at the same time achieving pseudorandomness against sub-exponential-time distinguishers. The pseudorandomness property relies on a new family of distorted McEliece assumptions that we introduce, instantiated with a class of expanded subcodes of Reed-Solomon codes, called Raw Reed-Solomon codes, for which we provide heuristic evidence of (plausible) sub-exponential hardness.

Our construction is obtained by revisiting the original blueprint by Christ and Gunn to obtain public-key PRCs based on McEliece assumptions. Along the way, we also uncover that their blueprint does not work directly with Raw Reed-Solomon codes. In particular, we show that a generating matrix of a permuted Raw Reed-Solomon code is distinguishable in polynomial time from a uniformly random generating matrix. To circumvent that difficulty, we propose to distort the public key by multiplication with a sparse invertible matrix of constant row Hamming weight.

Byzantine Agreement (BA) protocols must ensure not only agreement and termination, but also validity: the value agreed upon should meaningfully reflect the honest parties' inputs. The choice of validity condition can change the exact resilience threshold at which BA is solvable. Tight characterizations for BA with general validity conditions are known in the partially synchronous model (PODC'23), in the synchronous model (PODC'24), and in the network-agnostic model (DISC'25). We focus on general validity for synchronous BA with responsive termination. Such protocols remain secure against up to $t_s$ byzantine corruptions, but incur a running time that depends on the actual network delay $\delta$, rather than the conservative delay bound $\Delta \gg \delta$, whenever at most $t_r \leq t_s$ parties are corrupted.

We present a tight characterization of the validity properties solvable in this setting. We prove that every non-trivial validity property requires $n>2 t_r+t_s$ in authenticated settings, where a public-key infrastructure and digital signatures are available, and $n>3 t_s$ in unauthenticated settings. These threshold conditions are accompanied by a validity-dependent requirement, the responsive similarity condition: roughly, for any concrete configuration of honest inputs, there is a value that is valid for any view that a protocol could obtain from this initial configuration. We then present matching protocols in both settings, showing that these conditions are sufficient.

The main technical contribution is an authenticated responsive Core-Set Agreement protocol requiring $n>2 t_r+t_s$. This threshold may place the protocol in an honest-minority regime, where prior constructions for general validity do not apply and where standard Synchronous Broadcast is not responsive.

Finally, we instantiate the characterization for several standard validity notions -- weak validity, strong unanimity, convex validity, and honest-input validity.

We continue the study of fast functions, computable by linear-size circuits, that share useful properties of random functions. Motivated by cryptographic applications, we generalize and improve on previous results in this area, obtaining the following results:

- For any constant $t$, we construct a fast $t$-wise independent hash function with algebraic degree $\log_2 t$ (over $\mathbb F_2$), simultaneously optimizing both asymptotic circuit size and degree. - We simplify and improve a recent construction (ITCS 2026) of a family of fast codes with fast duals, both meeting the Gilbert-Varshamov bound. Unlike the previous construction, our construction has negligible failure probability, can accommodate general fields and rates, supports a systematic encoding, and admits fast universal encoders. - We strengthen the above to support stronger random-like properties, such as optimal combinatorial list-decoding. This is achieved by constructing, for any constant $t$, a family of fast linear functions that map any $t$ linearly independent inputs to uniform and statistically independent outputs. Prior to our work, this was only known for $t=1$.

We demonstrate the usefulness of the above results to cryptography. This includes the first nontrivial protocols for perfectly secure multiparty computation whose circuit complexity scales linearly with the number of parties, as well as protocols for computing encrypted matrix-vector products with optimal asymptotic circuit complexity.

Heterogeneous computing platforms increasingly rely on high-throughput data paths spanning CPUs and accelerators, yet most high-speed software ciphers are optimized primarily for CPU-centric execution models. We present AICE, an arithmetic-oriented stream cipher over \(\mathbb{Z}/2^{16}\mathbb{Z}\) with a 37-word (592-bit) internal state, a nonlinear feedback combining modular addition, multiplication, bitwise OR, and rotation, a 370-round initialization with post-initialization key feed-forward, and periodic blank updates. We analyze AICE under several cryptanalytic models, including differential trail screening, linear approximation over the abelian group \(\mathbb{Z}/2^{16}\mathbb{Z}\), guess-and-determine state recovery, and exact SMT-based cube evaluation, and find that all observable structural phenomena remain confined to reduced-round settings far below the full initialization. On the AI Cores of Huawei Ascend accelerators, AICE reaches a single-core peak throughput of $114.13$ Gbps on the Ascend 950 and $55.36$ Gbps on the Ascend 910B4, and scales to $1.59$ Tbps on $32$ Ascend 910B4 cores, roughly $54\times$ the throughput of AES-CTR and $107\times$ that of SM4-CTR on the same $32$-core configuration; on the ARM Kunpeng 920 it remains in the same throughput class as hardware instruction accelerated AES-CTR.

Modern cryptography relies on the intractability of computational problems. We present an approach to building cryptography from a new source of hardness: \emph{proving mathematical theorems}.

Our main result is a construction of succinct non-interactive arguments (SNARGs) for NP under a new, but natural, assumption on the hardness of proving lower bounds in proof complexity. Specifically, our assumption states that it is impossible to prove, within a weak bounded arithmetic theory, the correctness of certifying hard tautologies against Extended Frege. This assumption is inspired by an informal mathematical challenge proposed by Razborov [Ann. Math. '15], and can be viewed as a generalization of an unconditional unprovability result due to Krajíček and Pudlák [J. Symb. Log. '89].

Our construction is a simple variant of the SNARG construction of Jin, Kalai, Lombardi, and Vaikuntanathan [STOC '24]. While the soundness of their construction was proven only for a subclass of NP, we prove its soundness for all of NP under our assumption. At the heart of our result is the observation that cryptographic reasoning is simple in a formal sense: the security proof of most cryptographic primitives can be formalized in a weak theory. In particular, we show how to formalize the scheme of Jin et al. in Jeřábek's theory $\mathsf{APC}_1$ [J. Symb. Log. '07], a weak theory of bounded arithmetic.

Permissionless consensus enables parties to perform Byzantine agreement without any a priori knowledge about who is participating, except for an upper bound on the number of participants running the protocol (no PKI, etc.). Since Nakamoto’s Bitcoin paper, it has been widely believed that permissionless consensus is feasible provided the (Byzantine) adversary only controls a fraction of the collective computational power. However, all known protocols, including Nakamoto’s, rely on idealized assumptions (or ad hoc instantiations).

Is permissionless consensus possible without such assumptions? Surprising little progress had been made towards solving this open question until the recent result by Ball et al. (Crypto 2024), which showed how to achieve permissionless consensus from proofs of work (PoWs) based on fine-grained complexity assumptions in a setting where a randomness beacon is available to all parties running the protocol. Their work left open whether it is possible to remove the beacon assumption; this question is the focus of our work, which we resolve via a new consensus protocol construction that relies on a novel class of distributed samplers and a common random string (that does not need to be structured or sampled precisely at the onset of the protocol execution).

To prove our protocol secure, we revisit the concept of distributed samplers and adapt it to a setting where multiple sampler executions need to be simultaneously secure. To address this challenge we introduce the primitive we call d-wise independent distributed samplers and put forward constructions for such samplers based on DDH and LWE. We then present our consensus protocol via a modular design that utilizes a new moderately hard cryptographic primitive we call multi-verifier signatures of work, a sort of “time-based signature” we construct by composing distributed samplers and (fine-grained complexity-based) PoWs, and which may be of independent interest.

Censorship has always existed, serving both to prevent harms and to inflict them by chilling speech, suppressing organizing, and withholding inconvenient facts and ideas; most technical work aims to prevent all forms of censorship --- the "good", the "bad", and everything in between. We study the complementary, rarely explored goal of making any censorship attempt transparent. We formalize censorship-evident publishing systems (CEPS), protocols that force both overt and covert takedowns to yield transferable evidence. We also provide a CEPS instantiation with Streisand, a proof-of-concept deployment that combines a blockchain-backed timestamp oracle, private information retrieval (PIR)-based anonymous queries to prevent extraction attempts from being conspicuous, and probabilistic Merkle-witness retrieval to produce compact censorship proofs. We present performance evaluations on a 1.3 GiB Enron-derived dataset with regex-based PII redaction to model realistic censorship, and demonstrate that a background daemon can detect heavy censorship after a small number of post-censorship queries, making Streisand an effective auditing mechanism rather than interactive file retrieval. We also discuss design trade-offs (proof size vs. computation, PIR sufficiency vs. necessity), scalability limits, and how CEPS complements existing transparency practices, with Streisand as a starting point for CEPS deployments.

This paper presents high-performance Advanced Vector Extensions 512 (AVX-512) implementations of two Korean standard cryptographic algorithms: the Lightweight Secure Hash (LSH) hash function and Lightweight Encryption Algorithm-Galois/Counter Mode (LEA-GCM) authenticated encryption.

For LSH, we apply three optimization strategies: single-message processing using AVX-512 512-bit vector registers, dual-message parallel processing through register interleaving, and multi-core parallelization using a dynamic queue-based pthread thread pool.

For LEA-GCM, we propose an end-to-end optimization that replaces scalar Counter mode (CTR) encryption with 16-block AVX-512 parallel processing and Streaming SIMD Extensions (SSE)-based Galois Hash (GHASH) authentication with VPCLMULQDQ-based 4-block parallel processing.

Performance evaluation on an Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Tiger Lake) processor shows that LSH-256 achieves an average 1.16× throughput improvement and LSH-512 achieves an average 1.61× improvement over the Korea Internet and Security Agency (KISA) AVX2 reference implementation. Dual-message interleaving achieves an average superlinear speedup of 2.28× driven by instruction-level parallelism (ILP), and the 8-core thread pool delivers speedups of 3.50× to 5.12×.

The optimized LEA-GCM implementation achieves a 3.26× throughput improvement over the KISA SSE-based reference and a 12.1× improvement over the pure software implementation for 4096-byte inputs, with correctness verified against KISA official test vectors.

Electronic voting systems inherently encompass a structural tension among ballot secrecy, verifiability, and coercion resistance. Voters must be able to verify whether their votes have been included; however, if such verification information can serve as evidence presentable to a third party, it becomes a basis for post-election intimidation.

Existing studies have focused primarily on performance evaluation or data separation, and have not comprehensively addressed the structural tension between verifiability and coercion resistance. This study defines this tension as the verification paradox and designs and implements an electronic voting prototype on a three-organization consortium based on Hyperledger Fabric 2.5, combining a 2-of-3 endorsement policy, nullifier-based anonymity, Exponential ElGamal homomorphic tallying, zero-knowledge proof (ZKP)-based ballot validity verification, panic password-based deniable verification, and Private Data Collection (PDC)-based coerced vote separation.

Quantitative evaluation results confirm a server latency overhead of +0.9% for ElGamal relative to the AES performance baseline, statistical indistinguishability between normal and panic responses (p > 0.05), and a peak throughput of approximately 40.7 TPS (with an error rate of 0%) under 1,000 concurrent voters.

This study demonstrates that permissioned blockchains can provide practical mitigation of the verification paradox through implementation and quantitative evaluation.

The Korean Cryptographic Module Validation Program (KCMVP) is a national certification system that verifies the security and conformity of cryptographic modules deployed in government and public institutions. The current process typically takes about one and a half years, during which frequent supplement requests and the resulting retesting cycles substantially raise costs and delay schedules.

To address this, we propose an AI-based pre-certification framework that combines rule-based deterministic detection (L1), RAG-based guideline-evidence retrieval (L2), and LLM-based final decision (L3) into a funnel-shaped pipeline that progressively reduces false positives.

L1 applies more than 170 YAML inspection rules across four pattern types (missing, regex, semantic, ast) to perform deterministic detection. L2 retrieves and attaches KCMVP guideline evidence to each violation through multi-stage RAG search, and L3 employs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite to make context-aware decisions on false-positive candidates.

In an initial evaluation on 128 Ground Truth cases derived from the KISA LEA code, the system detected all 128 cases, achieving 100% recall, while L3 correctly removed 9 of 46 FP candidates (19.6%) without inducing any false negatives (FN), confirming the stepwise refinement effect of the funnel structure.

A blind verification on a certified commercial cryptographic module (~14.5 KLOC) yielded a low detection frequency of 0.58 cases per 1,000 lines of code, supporting the system’s practicality in real environments.

The advancement of quantum computing threatens public-key cryptographic algorithms used in TLS connections, such as RSA and ECDHE. The Harvest Now, Decrypt Later (HNDL) attack exposes long-term confidential data to risk even before quantum computers are practically realized, yet a systematic methodology for immediately quantifying the quantum vulnerability of individual TLS connections remains absent.

This paper proposes a layered risk scoring model that quantifies the quantum threat exposure of TLS connections on a 0–100 scale. The model decomposes risk into five independent layers—TLS protocol exposure (L1), legacy public-key vulnerability (L2a), AES-128 Grover weakening (L2b), PQC Level-1 vulnerability (L2c), and certificate expiration urgency (L3)—and incorporates an HNDL global multiplier M that reflects the confidentiality retention period of transmitted data.

Applied to 502 real-world TLS sessions across four industry sectors with M = 1.50, the domestic average risk score (16.0) is approximately 34% higher than the global average (11.9), with domestic legacy key exchange usage at 77.4% versus 53.5% globally and PQC adoption at 22.6% versus 46.5%.

These results quantitatively confirm the elevated quantum risk of domestic network infrastructure, underscoring the urgency of PQC transition.

The “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later (HNDL)” attack—which intercepts and stores encrypted communications before quantum computers become practical and decrypts them afterward—poses a long-term threat to TLS communication channels. Following the completion of NIST PQC standardization, organizations must pursue a phased migration of their TLS layers; however, existing approaches are limited by late detection of configuration errors, absence of cryptographic asset tracking, and insufficient automated response.

This paper proposes an 11-Step DevSecOps pipeline grounded in Policy as Code. The pipeline automatically validates and deploys a 3-Stage TLS migration—Classical ECC (Stage 1), Hybrid PQC (Stage 2), and Advanced Hybrid PQC (Stage 3)—through 11 steps per execution, integrating OQS-Nginx custom builds, security scanning, CBOM Diff, and matrix CI regression detection.

In our evaluation against six PQC toolchain pitfalls, standard SCA/SAST/SBOM pre-detected 0/6, whereas custom builds pre-prevented 5/6 and matrix CI detected 6/6 at runtime. In an evaluation of LLM-based code migration across 80 trials (55 responses received), even with static AST validation applied, 24 failures due to signature/argument hallucination (43.6% of response trials) were only caught at runtime, quantitatively confirming that semantic execution validation is an essential component of multi-layered defense.

Organizations relying on RSA-OAEP encryption in protocols such as JWE, SAML, and OIDC face a critical challenge: transitioning to post-quantum cryptography without disrupting operational continuity. This paper presents a phased migration strategy that uses RSA-KEM-ML-KEM composite Key Encapsulation Mechanisms as an intermediary step between current RSA-OAEP encryption and the target state of pure ML-KEM adoption. We formalize the RSA-KEM-ML-KEM construction, prove IND-CCA2 security via a Split-Key PRF combiner, and integrate it into the Hybrid Public-Key Encryption (HPKE) framework. Our implementation demonstrates that composite schemes enable quantum-resistant encryption while preserving existing RSA key infrastructure, though with measurable throughput trade-offs that inform migration timelines. We analyze protocol-specific integration for JWE, SAML, and OIDC encryption use cases, providing decision frameworks for transitioning from RSA-OAEP through composite approaches to pure post-quantum encryption. This work contributes a formally analyzed transition mechanism and practical migration guidance for organizations seeking to adopt quantum-resistant encryption in RSA-dependent systems, validated through application to identity and access management protocols.

Using the language of categories, we introduce a novel framework abstracting the key algorithmic features of the Deuring correspondence between supersingular elliptic curves and quaternion orders and of the post-quantum signature scheme SQIsign based on it. We then show how to construct an interactive identification scheme and digital signature within this framework, and also instantiate more advanced primitives, such as a chameleon hash function. We present two distinct instantiations of the framework based on isogenies of supersingular elliptic curves: the first recovers (one-dimensional) SQIsign, while the second leads to the recently published SQInstructor.

FrodoKEM is an unstructured LWE-based key encapsulation mechanism (KEM), widely recognized for its conservativeness and robustness. However, there remains a performance gap of approximately one order of magnitude between FrodoKEM and structured LWE-based KEMs, which severely limits its competitiveness during the standardization process. This work proposes the fastest hardware implementation of FrodoKEM to date, which is also configurable, achieving up to 2.5× speedup over prior hardware designs. Specifically, for the most time-consuming module, modular matrix multiplication, a block matrix processing approach is adopted, where the computation is reformulated into block-level operations and further mapped to vector inner-product computations. Based on this formulation, two optimized architectures are proposed for vector inner-product computation using a carry-save-adder (CSA)-based Wallace tree structure, achieving improvements in resource efficiency while eliminating the use of DSP resources. By fixing the block size to 4×4, the data generation rate using parallel SHAKE-based random number generators is precisely matched with the data consumption rate of matrix multiplication, thereby improving hardware utilization efficiency. The proposed design is implemented in Verilog and verified on both Xilinx Virtex-7 and Artix-7 FPGA platforms, as well as ASIC implementation.

Digital signature schemes based on isogenies are among the most compact signatures achieving post-quantum security. Recent advances, especially those leveraging higher-dimensional isogenies, have also made such schemes practically efficient. However, comparatively little attention has been devoted to endowing these signatures with additional privacy-enhancing properties, such as the re-randomization of keys and the adaptation of signatures to new public keys. Although some results exist in the isogeny group action setting, these signatures suffer from a subexponential quantum attack which renders them rather inefficient.

In this work, we initiate the first systematic study of privacy-enhancing isogeny-based signatures outside the group-action framework. We base our exploration on the notion of signatures with randomizable keys developed by Celi et al. (FC'24), which aims to unify privacy notions related to key updatability and signature adaptation. In particular, we analyze which of their privacy notions can be achieved from the state-of-the-art signatures SQIsign, PRISM and the hash-and-sign signature scheme derived from the Deuring verifiable unpredictable function (DeuringVUF).

To this end, we naturally extend SQIsign to an SWRK scheme that allows key randomization, and enhance both PRISM and the DeuringVUF signature to additionally allow for message adaptation. We show that, due to the deterministic nature of the signatures, the DeuringVUF signature achieves perfect adaptability. We formally prove all three of our modifications achieve unlinkability against unbounded adversaries, and remain unforgeable under the same assumptions as the original schemes.

The hardness of the Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) problem is a foundational assumption in cryptography, forming the basis of constructions ranging from symmetric-key primitives to public-key encryption and beyond. A central open question is whether the average-case hardness of LPN can be based on worst-case complexity assumptions, as has been achieved for the analogous Learning With Errors (LWE) problem.

Existing worst-case-to-average-case reductions for LPN [BLVW19, YZ21] rely on statistical smoothing of linear codes, which inherently limits the resulting average-case hardness to noise rates as large as $1/2 - 1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$, which is insufficient for public-key applications.

We explore a new approach towards obtaining such reductions: rather than requiring that random sparse combinations of the rows of the generator matrix of a code be statistically close to uniform, we only require that they be computationally indistinguishable from uniform. This leads to a clean win-win structure: we show that any efficient LPN solver can be transformed into a pair of efficient algorithms $(S, D)$ such that for every matrix $A$ of appropriate dimensions over $\mathbb{F}_2$, either $S$ decodes the code generated by $A$ from random noise, or $D$ distinguishes random noisy codewords of the dual of this code from uniform.

By instantiating this reduction with appropriate parameters, we obtain the average-case hardness of LPN with inverse-polynomial noise rate $n^{-\alpha}$ for any constant $\alpha < 1$, assuming the worst-case simultaneous hardness of decoding a code from random noise and distinguishing random noisy codewords of its dual from uniform. In particular, setting $\alpha = 1/2$, our reduction yields LPN hardness in the parameter regime required for Alekhnovich's construction of public-key encryption [Ale03], a regime that was previously inaccessible via worst-case reductions.

We study the security of the Fiat-Shamir transformation when applied to multi-round oracle proofs in the standard model, showing that Interactive Oracle Proofs (IOPs) can be transformed via Fiat-Shamir into Non-interactive Zero-knowledge (NIZK) arguments.

We obtain our result in two steps. First, we show that instantiating Kilian's transformation with an IOP satisfying a mild Zero-Knowledge (ZK) property called semi-Honest-Verifier ZK (semi-HVZK), and a commitment scheme that is extractable and equivocal, yields a ZK argument. We then obtain provably-secure NIZK arguments from our interactive ZK arguments by instantiating Fiat-Shamir with a Correlation-Intractable Hash (CIH) function. The second step involves carefully defining an appropriate "bad relation" for which CIHs are known to exist. Existence of CIH for our bad relation requires the underlying semi-HVZK IOP to have an additional "doom checkability" property which we introduce. Roughly, doom checkability guarantees that one can efficiently check whether a non-empty partial IOP transcript is "doomed" in the sense that it will lead the verifier to reject. We then show that IOPs based on the "MPC in the Head" paradigm are doom checkable.

Our results show that the Fiat-Shamir paradigm can be applied to semi-HVZK IOPs to yield provably-secure NIZKs. This extends similar results known for single-round IOPs (i.e., Probabilistically Checkable Proofs) and interactive proofs (IPs), and establishes the soundness of this method. Along the way, we also prove composition theorems for semi-HVZK IOPs, which might be of independent interest, and use them to improve the soundness error of linear-time IOPs and interactive arguments from the literature.