IACR News item: 05 November 2025
Justin Thaler
ePrint Report
SNARKs work by having a prover commit to a witness and then prove that the committed witness is valid. The prover’s work is dominated by two tasks: (i) committing to data and (ii) proving that the committed data is well-formed. The central thesis of this survey is that fast SNARKs minimize both costs by using the sum-check protocol.
But not all uses of sum-check are equally effective. The fastest SNARKs invoke sum-check in highly sophisticated ways, exploiting repeated structure in computation to aggressively minimize commitment costs and prover work. I survey the key ideas that enable this: batch evaluation arguments, read/write memory checking, virtual polynomials, sparse sum-checks, and small-value preservation. These techniques unlock the full potential of the sum-check protocol as a foundation for fast SNARK proving.
But not all uses of sum-check are equally effective. The fastest SNARKs invoke sum-check in highly sophisticated ways, exploiting repeated structure in computation to aggressively minimize commitment costs and prover work. I survey the key ideas that enable this: batch evaluation arguments, read/write memory checking, virtual polynomials, sparse sum-checks, and small-value preservation. These techniques unlock the full potential of the sum-check protocol as a foundation for fast SNARK proving.
Additional news items may be found on the IACR news page.