## CryptoDB

### Riad S. Wahby

#### Publications

**Year**

**Venue**

**Title**

2024

EUROCRYPT

Unlocking the lookup singularity with Lasso
Abstract

This paper introduces Lasso, a new family of lookup arguments, which allow an untrusted prover to commit to a vector $a \in \mathbb{F}^m$ and prove that all entries of $a$ reside in some predetermined table $t \in \mathbb{F}^n$. Lasso's performance characteristics unlock the so-called ``lookup singularity''. Lasso works with any multilinear polynomial commitment scheme, and provides the following efficiency properties.
(1) For $m$ lookups into a table of size $n$, Lasso's prover commits to just $m+n$ field elements. Moreover, the committed field elements are \emph{small}, meaning that, no matter
how big the field $\mathbb{F}$ is, they are all in the set $\{0, \dots, m\}$. When using a multiexponentiation-based commitment scheme, this
results in the prover's costs dominated by only $O(m+n)$ group \emph{operations} (e.g., elliptic curve point additions), plus the cost to prove an evaluation of a multilinear polynomial whose evaluations over the Boolean hypercube are the table entries. This represents a significant improvement in prover costs over prior lookup arguments (e.g., plookup, Halo2's lookups, lookup arguments based on logarithmic derivatives).
(2) Unlike all prior lookup arguments, if the table $t$ is structured (in a precise sense that we define), then no party needs to commit to $t$, enabling the use of much larger tables than prior works (e.g., of size $2^{128}$ or larger). Moreover, Lasso's prover only ``pays'' in runtime for table entries that are
accessed by the lookup operations. This applies to tables commonly used to implement range checks, bitwise operations, big-number arithmetic, and even transitions of a full-fledged CPU such as RISC-V. Specifically, for any integer parameter $c>1$, Lasso's prover's dominant cost is committing to $3 \cdot c \cdot m + c \cdot n^{1/c}$ field elements. Furthermore, all these field elements are ``small'', meaning they are in the set $\{0, \dots, \max\{m, n^{1/c}, q\}-1\}$, where $q$ is the maximum value in any of the sub-tables that collectively capture $t$ (in a precise manner that we define).

2023

CRYPTO

Brakedown: Linear-time and field-agnostic SNARKs for R1CS
Abstract

This paper introduces a SNARK called Brakedown. Brakedown targets R1CS, a popular NP-complete problem that generalizes circuit-satisfiability. It is the first built system that provides a linear-time prover, meaning the prover incurs O(N) finite field operations to prove the satisfiability of an N-sized R1CS instance. Brakedown’s prover is faster, both concretely and asymptotically, than prior SNARK implementations. It does not require a trusted setup and may be post-quantum secure. Furthermore, it is compatible with arbitrary finite fields of sufficient size; this property is new among built proof systems with sublinear proof sizes. To design Brakedown, we observe that recent work of Bootle, Chiesa, and Groth (BCG, TCC 2020) provides a polynomial commitment scheme that, when combined with the linear-time interactive proof system of Spartan (CRYPTO 2020), yields linear-time IOPs and SNARKs for R1CS (a similar theoretical result was previously established by BCG, but our approach is conceptually simpler, and crucial for achieving high-speed SNARKs). A core ingredient in the polynomial commitment scheme that we distill from BCG is a linear-time encodable code. Existing constructions of such codes are believed to be impractical. Nonetheless, we design and engineer a new one that is practical in our context.
We also implement a variant of Brakedown that uses Reed-Solomon codes instead of our linear-time encodable codes; we refer to this variant as Shockwave. Shockwave is not a linear-time SNARK, but it provides shorter proofs and lower verification times than Brakedown, and also provides a faster prover than prior plausibly post-quantum SNARKs.

2019

TCHES

Fast and simple constant-time hashing to the BLS12-381 elliptic curve
📺
Abstract

Pairing-friendly elliptic curves in the Barreto-Lynn-Scott family are seeing a resurgence in popularity because of the recent result of Kim and Barbulescu that improves attacks against other pairing-friendly curve families. One particular Barreto-Lynn-Scott curve, called BLS12-381, is the locus of significant development and deployment effort, especially in blockchain applications. This effort has sparked interest in using the BLS12-381 curve for BLS signatures, which requires hashing to one of the groups of the bilinear pairing defined by BLS12-381.While there is a substantial body of literature on the problem of hashing to elliptic curves, much of this work does not apply to Barreto-Lynn-Scott curves. Moreover, the work that does apply has the unfortunate property that fast implementations are complex, while simple implementations are slow.In this work, we address these issues. First, we show a straightforward way of adapting the “simplified SWU” map of Brier et al. to BLS12-381. Second, we describe optimizations to this map that both simplify its implementation and improve its performance; these optimizations may be of interest in other contexts. Third, we implement and evaluate. We find that our work yields constant-time hash functions that are simple to implement, yet perform within 9% of the fastest, non–constant-time alternatives, which require much more complex implementations.

#### Coauthors

- Dan Boneh (1)
- Alexander Golovnev (1)
- Jonathan Lee (1)
- Srinath T. V. Setty (2)
- Justin Thaler (2)