International Association
for Cryptologic Research

At CRYPTO 2015, Kirchner and Fouque claimed that a carefully tuned variant of the Blum-Kalai-Wasserman (BKW) algorithm (JACM 2003) should solve the Learning with Errors problem (LWE) in slightly subexponential time for modulus $q = n^{\Theta(1)}$ and narrow error distribution, when given enough LWE samples. Taking a modular view, one may regard BKW as a combination of Wagner's algorithm (CRYPTO 2002), run over the corresponding dual problem, and the Aharonov-Regev distinguisher (JACM 2005). Hence the subexponential Wagner step alone should be of interest for solving this dual problem - namely, the Short Integer Solution problem (SIS) - but this appears to be undocumented so far. We re-interpret this Wagner step as walking backward through a chain of projected lattices, zigzagging through some auxiliary superlattices. We further randomize the bucketing step using Gaussian randomized rounding to exploit the powerful discrete Gaussian machinery. This approach avoids sample amplification and turns Wagner's algorithm into an approximate discrete Gaussian sampler for $q$-ary lattices. For an SIS lattice with $n$ equations modulo $q$, this algorithm runs in subexponential time $\exp(O(n/\log \log n))$ to reach a Gaussian width parameter of, say, $s = q/\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ only requiring $m = n + \omega(n/\log \log n)$ many SIS variables. For instance, this directly provides a provable algorithm for solving the Short Integer Solution problem in the infinity norm ($\mathrm{SIS}^\infty$) for norm bounds $\beta = q/\mathrm{polylog}(n)$. This variant of SIS underlies the security of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standard ML-DSA, also known as Dilithium. Despite its subexponential complexity, Wagner's algorithm does not appear to threaten ML-DSA's concrete security.

Is module-lattice reduction better than unstructured lattice reduction? This question was highlighted as 'Q8' in the Kyber NIST standardization submission (Avanzi et al., 2021), as potentially affecting the concrete security of Kyber and other module-lattice-based schemes. Foundational works on module-lattice reduction (Lee, Pellet-Mary, Stehlé, and Wallet, ASIACRYPT 2019; Mukherjee and Stephens-Davidowitz, CRYPTO 2020) confirmed the existence of such module variants of LLL and block-reduction algorithms, but focus only on provable worst-case asymptotic behavior. In this work, we present a concrete average-case analysis of module-lattice reduction. Specifically, we address the question of the expected slope after running module-BKZ, and pinpoint the discriminant $\Delta_K$ of the number field at hand as the main quantity driving this slope. We convert this back into a gain or loss on the blocksize $\beta$: module-BKZ in a number field $K$ of degree $d$ requires an SVP oracle of dimension $ \beta + \log(|\Delta_K| / d^d)\beta /(d\log \beta) + o(\beta / \log \beta)$ to reach the same slope as unstructured BKZ with blocksize $\beta$. This asymptotic summary hides further terms that we predict concretely using experimentally verified heuristics. Incidentally, we provide the first open-source implementation of module-BKZ for some cyclotomic fields. For power-of-two cyclotomic conductors, we have $|\Delta_K| = d^d$, and observe that module-BKZ needs a blocksize larger than its unstructured counterpart. On the contrary, for all other cyclotomic fields, $|\Delta_K| < d^d$, so module-BKZ provides a sublinear $\Theta(\beta/\log \beta)$ gain on the required blocksize, yielding a subexponential speedup of $\exp(\Theta(\beta/\log \beta))$.