## CryptoDB

### Minh-Huyen Nguyen

#### Publications

Year
Venue
Title
2008
JOFC
2006
EPRINT
We show that every language in NP has a *statistical* zero-knowledge argument system under the (minimal) complexity assumption that one-way functions exist. In such protocols, even a computationally unbounded verifier cannot learn anything other than the fact that the assertion being proven is true, whereas a polynomial-time prover cannot convince the verifier to accept a false assertion except with negligible probability. This resolves an open question posed by Naor, Ostrovsky, Venkatesan, and Yung (CRYPTO 92, J. Cryptology 98). Departing from previous works on this problem, we do not construct standard statistically hiding commitments from any one-way function. Instead, we construct a relaxed variant of commitment schemes called "1-out-of-2-binding commitments," recently introduced by Nguyen and Vadhan (STOC 06).
2005
TCC
2004
TCC
2004
EPRINT
Goldreich and Lindell (CRYPTO 01) recently presented the first protocol for password-authenticated key exchange in the standard model (with no common reference string or set-up assumptions other than the shared password). However, their protocol uses several heavy tools and has a complicated analysis. We present a simplification of the Goldreich--Lindell (GL) protocol and analysis for the special case when the dictionary is of the form $D=\{0,1\}^d$, i.e. the password is a short random string (like an ATM PIN number). Our protocol can be converted into one for arbitrary dictionaries using a common reference string of logarithmic length. The security bound achieved by our protocol is somewhat worse than the GL protocol. Roughly speaking, our protocol guarantees that the adversary can break'' the scheme with probability at most $O(\mathrm{poly}(n)/|D|)^{\Omega(1)}$, whereas the GL protocol guarantees a bound of $O(1/|D|)$. We also present an alternative, more natural definition of security than the augmented definition'' of Goldreich and Lindell, and prove that the two definitions are equivalent.

#### Coauthors

Shien Jin Ong (1)