International Association
for Cryptologic Research

Blind signatures have received increased attention from researchers and practitioners. They allow users to obtain a signature under a message without revealing it to the signer. One of the most popular applications of blind signatures is to use them as one-time tokens, where the issuing is not linkable to the redeeming phase, and the signature under a random identifier forms a valid token. This concept is the backbone of the Privacy Pass system, which uses it to identify honest but anonymous users and protect content delivery networks from botnets. Non-interactive blind signatures for random messages were introduced by Hanzlik (Eurocrypt'23). They allow a signer to create a pre-signature with respect to a particular public key, while the corresponding secret key can later be used to finalize the signature. This non-interaction allows for more applications than in the case of blind signatures. In particular, the author suggested using regular PKI keys as the recipient public key, allowing for a distribution of one-time tokens to users outside the system, e.g., to public keys of GitHub users, similar to airdropping of cryptocurrencies. Unfortunately, despite introducing this concept, the paper fails to provide schemes that work with keys used in the wild. We solve this open problem. We introduce a generic construction of non-interactive blind signatures that relies on Yao's garbled circuit techniques and provide particular improvements to this generic setting. We replace oblivious transfer with their non-interactive variant and show how to construct them so that the recipient's public key, encoding the OT choice, is a standard RSA public key (e,N). To improve the efficiency of the garbling, we show how to garble the signing algorithm of the pairing-based Pointcheval-Sanders (PS) signatures and the RSA-based signature scheme with efficient protocols by Camenisch and Lysyanskaya. Our technique also apply to the well-known BBS signatures. All our improvements are of independent interest and are central to our contribution.

Somewhere statistically binding (SSB) hashing allows us to sample a special hashing key such that the digest statistically binds the input at $m$ secret locations. This hash function is said to be somewhere extractable (SE) if there is an additional trapdoor that allows the extraction of the input bits at the $m$ locations from the digest. Devadas, Goyal, Kalai, and Vaikuntanathan (FOCS 22) introduced a variant of somewhere extractable hashing called rate-1 fully local SE hash functions. The rate-1 requirement states that the size of the digest is $m + \polyn(\lambda)$ (where $\lambda$ is the security parameter). The fully local property requires that for any index $i$, there is a ``very short" opening showing that $i$-th bit of the hashed input is equal to $b$ for some $b \in \bin$. The size of this opening is required to be independent of $m$ and in particular, this means that its size is independent of the size of the digest. Devadas et al. gave such a construction from Learning with Errors (LWE). In this work, we give a construction of a rate-1 fully local somewhere extractable hash function from Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) and BARGs. Under the same assumptions, we give constructions of rate-1 BARG and RAM SNARG with partial input soundness whose proof sizes are only matched by prior constructions based on LWE.

<p> In this work we study algebraic and generic models for group actions, and extend them to the universal composability (UC) framework of Canetti (FOCS 2001). We revisit the constructions of Duman et al. (PKC 2023) integrating the type-safe model by Zhandry (Crypto 2022), adapted to the group action setting, and formally define an algebraic action model (AAM). This model restricts the power of the adversary in a similar fashion to the algebraic group model (AGM). By imposing algebraic behaviour to the adversary and environment of the UC framework, we construct the UC-AAM. Finally, we instantiate UC-AAM with isogeny-based assumptions, in particular the CSIDH action with twists, obtaining the explicit isogeny model, UC-EI; we observe that, under certain assumptions, this model is "closer" to standard UC than the UC-AGM, even though there still exists an important separation. We demonstrate the utility of our definitions by proving UC-EI security for the passive-secure oblivious transfer protocol described by Lai et al. (Eurocrypt 2021), hence providing the first concretely efficient two-message isogeny-based OT protocol in the random oracle model against malicious adversaries. </p>